▲ 196 ▼ ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI (www.nature.com) submitted 3 years ago by Five@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org 129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Ferk@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago* (1 child) A test that didn't require a human could theoretically be tested automatically by the machine preemptively and solved easily. I can't imagine how would you test this in a way that wouldn't require a human. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* Bro, humans literally don't have that capability (that's the presumption here). Or are you saying that many of us don't have better consciousness than AIs? I might agree with that! permalink fedilink source parent [–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago https://youtu.be/WnzlbyTZsQY permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ferk@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) The AI can only judge by having a neural network trained on what's a human and what's an AI (and btw, for that training you need humans)... which means you can break that test by making an AI that also accesses that same neural network and uses it to self-test the responses before outputting them, providing only exactly the kind of output the other AI would give a "human" verdict on. So I don't think that would work very well, it'll just be a cat & mouse race between the AIs. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* Bro, humans literally don't have that capability (that's the presumption here). Or are you saying that many of us don't have better consciousness than AIs? I might agree with that! permalink fedilink source parent [–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago https://youtu.be/WnzlbyTZsQY permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ferk@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) The AI can only judge by having a neural network trained on what's a human and what's an AI (and btw, for that training you need humans)... which means you can break that test by making an AI that also accesses that same neural network and uses it to self-test the responses before outputting them, providing only exactly the kind of output the other AI would give a "human" verdict on. So I don't think that would work very well, it'll just be a cat & mouse race between the AIs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 3 years ago* Bro, humans literally don't have that capability (that's the presumption here). Or are you saying that many of us don't have better consciousness than AIs? I might agree with that! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 3 years ago https://youtu.be/WnzlbyTZsQY permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ferk@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) The AI can only judge by having a neural network trained on what's a human and what's an AI (and btw, for that training you need humans)... which means you can break that test by making an AI that also accesses that same neural network and uses it to self-test the responses before outputting them, providing only exactly the kind of output the other AI would give a "human" verdict on. So I don't think that would work very well, it'll just be a cat & mouse race between the AIs. permalink fedilink source parent