It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

No. I'm just not willing to attribute a COMPANY as the sole owner/stakeholder in a protocol that honestly has very little to do with them.

Just because Github does something, doesn't mean that they represent git.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    I just used the most popular/known example. Personally I haven't liked GitHub since Micro$oft bought them. I'm ol' school, 25 years in the biz so M$ really really leaves a bad aftertaste in my mouth.

    I'll answer your other question in the other thread.

  • source
  • parent