135
People with Usenet invites to offer - WE NEED YOU! (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [M] to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/26316374

I know that this community will fall to the exact same destiny as they all do. 999 posts wanting a Drunkenslug invite and if all the stars align we get a once in a lifetime post of someone offering an invite.

Many of Usenet users don't actually know they can invite people and help others to their first steps into that scene.

So i beg of you, take a look into your profiles, find those invite buttons and offer them here! They will not be of any use if they just get dusty in your profiles, we need those invites in the community!

There is absolutely nothing for you personally to gain here, other than the satisfaction of helping others.

Thank you all and cheers!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

How come those big hosters get away with such infringements? I guess they must be less popular than Megaupload and such

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I don't think they are less popular.

    But their whole system works different. There is not a single file there that's called Inception.h265.HDR.mkv for example

    Its all just billions of g24hg54j2k7j6nb2n1n5b5j files with absolute gibberish as content. So you need the nzb files to actually get stuff out of it.

    But the nzb files also don't hold any copyright infringing material in and of itself.

    So copyright holders have to fight two thing at once

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    No matter which encoding is used to store data, the hoster is still responsible for it. On mega, the data is encrypted, yet mega is still held responsible for removing content reported by copyright holders (the decryption keys being included in reports).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    They get DMCA'd regularly and content get removed on Usenet as well. But the fact that they have to report literally thousands of individual files every time make it slow and inefficient. People will just reload the same item many times and it's always there.

    Each copy, each single file in which the copy is split needs to be identified and asked for removal. Compared to torrents, it's a long and complex task.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent