277
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Typically that's more of a CYA move. If someone finds something that isn't chicken cell they could sue for false advertising, but if it's 100% chicken cell nobody can sue for saying it was 99%.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I was digging into this question and only found that it might be leftovers of whatever they feed the cells (which also no longer includes anything from live or harvested animals, which is cool). CYA covers that and so much more so I think you're right.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Oh a strong possibility here, it'd still be nice to know, but it's understandable from a legal standpoint. Besides 1% is nothing, especially when comparing it to the 4% human flesh that's allowed in current meat production.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
277 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22696 readers
61 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS