▲ 1114 ▼ Come and take it (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Substance_P@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 247 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) And what “shit” was he doing there? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -21 points 2 years ago (3 children) Cleaning graffiti if I recall correctly. Cleaning up in general in a dangerous area subject to some riots. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s astonishing to me that you are simultaneously capable of forming full sentences and not seeing how useless and dumb that sentence sounds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -18 points 2 years ago (1 child) And yet it wasn't illegal. If it was he would have been found guilty. I said nothing of the intelligence of his plans, just what I remember of the facts. I remember he wasn't doing anything wrong, but was targeted by some shitstains who chased after an armed guy. That was ultimately the stupidest decision on the day. One of the shitstains was a felon with a gun, and the dead one was a sex offender. If I got some of the details wrong it's because I don't care enough to look it up because it's a decided case. Sounds a lot like FAFO to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You recall very incorrectly and should probably look up what really happened before you so confidently make incorrect statements. Ask yourself why he had zero cleaning equipment and instead only brought a loaded rifle. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Alright. Go ahead. Bring your evidence, because I saw the pictures and video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) 17 year old in possession of a firearm. Misdemeanor. There. One simple charge and you are wrong. You clearly aren't interested in truth, just your opinion on it. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago He claimed he was hired to guard someone's dealership, and when the guy denied ever hiring him he tried to say "Actually it was my dad's dealership!" then when he was called on that lie he stopped bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -21 points 2 years ago (3 children) Cleaning graffiti if I recall correctly. Cleaning up in general in a dangerous area subject to some riots. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s astonishing to me that you are simultaneously capable of forming full sentences and not seeing how useless and dumb that sentence sounds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -18 points 2 years ago (1 child) And yet it wasn't illegal. If it was he would have been found guilty. I said nothing of the intelligence of his plans, just what I remember of the facts. I remember he wasn't doing anything wrong, but was targeted by some shitstains who chased after an armed guy. That was ultimately the stupidest decision on the day. One of the shitstains was a felon with a gun, and the dead one was a sex offender. If I got some of the details wrong it's because I don't care enough to look it up because it's a decided case. Sounds a lot like FAFO to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You recall very incorrectly and should probably look up what really happened before you so confidently make incorrect statements. Ask yourself why he had zero cleaning equipment and instead only brought a loaded rifle. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Alright. Go ahead. Bring your evidence, because I saw the pictures and video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) 17 year old in possession of a firearm. Misdemeanor. There. One simple charge and you are wrong. You clearly aren't interested in truth, just your opinion on it. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago He claimed he was hired to guard someone's dealership, and when the guy denied ever hiring him he tried to say "Actually it was my dad's dealership!" then when he was called on that lie he stopped bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago (1 child) It’s astonishing to me that you are simultaneously capable of forming full sentences and not seeing how useless and dumb that sentence sounds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -18 points 2 years ago (1 child) And yet it wasn't illegal. If it was he would have been found guilty. I said nothing of the intelligence of his plans, just what I remember of the facts. I remember he wasn't doing anything wrong, but was targeted by some shitstains who chased after an armed guy. That was ultimately the stupidest decision on the day. One of the shitstains was a felon with a gun, and the dead one was a sex offender. If I got some of the details wrong it's because I don't care enough to look it up because it's a decided case. Sounds a lot like FAFO to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -18 points 2 years ago (1 child) And yet it wasn't illegal. If it was he would have been found guilty. I said nothing of the intelligence of his plans, just what I remember of the facts. I remember he wasn't doing anything wrong, but was targeted by some shitstains who chased after an armed guy. That was ultimately the stupidest decision on the day. One of the shitstains was a felon with a gun, and the dead one was a sex offender. If I got some of the details wrong it's because I don't care enough to look it up because it's a decided case. Sounds a lot like FAFO to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Do you not remember the very iconic picture of him in his blue gloves? At the very least he did have something. Usually when somebody is running from attackers they don't pick up the bucket of supplies they were using before running away. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) You recall very incorrectly and should probably look up what really happened before you so confidently make incorrect statements. Ask yourself why he had zero cleaning equipment and instead only brought a loaded rifle. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Alright. Go ahead. Bring your evidence, because I saw the pictures and video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) 17 year old in possession of a firearm. Misdemeanor. There. One simple charge and you are wrong. You clearly aren't interested in truth, just your opinion on it. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 years ago (2 children) Alright. Go ahead. Bring your evidence, because I saw the pictures and video. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) 17 year old in possession of a firearm. Misdemeanor. There. One simple charge and you are wrong. You clearly aren't interested in truth, just your opinion on it. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent [+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) 17 year old in possession of a firearm. Misdemeanor. There. One simple charge and you are wrong. You clearly aren't interested in truth, just your opinion on it. Have a good one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 years ago 17 year olds are typically only restricted from handguns. Go ahead and point to the law that says he wasn't allowed to possess a long gun at that time. Maybe you should have been on the prosecution if you're so good. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago Here's the picture everybody saw of him cleaning before the shooting. Obviously you have no memories of the actual situation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago He claimed he was hired to guard someone's dealership, and when the guy denied ever hiring him he tried to say "Actually it was my dad's dealership!" then when he was called on that lie he stopped bringing it up. permalink fedilink source parent
