▲ 1314 ▼ "We've won, but at what cost?" (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by mecfs@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world 322 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 97 points 2 years ago (3 children) Mozilla chose a stupid business model. 🤷 permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 138 points 2 years ago* (7 children) They’ve undoubtedly been preparing for this day in some capacity. If they didn’t and collapse then yes they chose a stupid business model. But until that happens I think this is a premature statement. It is shocking to me how many people on Lemmy hate Firefox, which is basically the only real non-chromium alternative that most people can use with minimal compromises. So many people hate Google here yet y’all seem to hate the only viable competitor even more. It’s bizarre to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 108 points 2 years ago (3 children) It is shocking to me how many people on Lemmy hate Firefox Although some people are Google fanbois or reactionary dumbasses, I think most of what you're misinterpreting as "Firefox hate" is actually love for Firefox and hate for what Mozilla has done to it. Most Firefox-critics' feelings towards it are more like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 44 points 2 years ago Love the browser, hate the corpos desperately trying to fuck it up because that's the cool thing to do to your software now days. permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I remember building Phoenix from source when it was basically still an experiment to decouple it from the suite. Good times. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 point 2 years ago Yes. 😢 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) Consider that many of the same people think of Arch as a viable daily driver distro for the everyman. Some folks are more accepting of jank than others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 years ago Those are just people who forgot what it was like to not be confident/super knowledgeable with computers and have lost the ability to talk about how to help “the average” user. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) this does mystify me. only time I nearly dropped firefox was when they did the big change that broke add ons but firefox with the addons I like is the best browser for me. nothing they have done has been consequentially bad. philosophically maybe but the actual effect is not bad compared to any other options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I think people make a way too big of a deal out of the “Google is the default search engine” thing. If you are worried about that, you can turn it off with like two clicks. For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it and I would’ve done the same exact thing. Besides that I just don’t think there is enough reason to be so anti-Firefox. Especially given our current internet climate. And for those who really are that adamant, there are plenty of forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it. Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately "overpaying" on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don't want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too. Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 17 points 2 years ago I always got the opposite impression: people here love Firefox. But it seems that's part of why they're critical of its shortcomings. At least for me, if I'm criticizing something, it probably means I care at least a little bit about whatever I'm criticizing. Not worth time talking about things I actually dislike. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago I don't think people hate Firefox as much as people hate Mozilla and what they're doing with Firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) its an emotional reaction. google has always been bad, them doing a bad thing is just business as usual. who cares but when mozilla does something bad? mozilla is supposed to be the good guy! they betrayed us! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I’d like you to show me how Mozilla is operating on the same evil level as Google. There’s no way you can make that argument. And yes “less bad” by orders of magnitude is way better and enough for me to use Firefox over Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago* its an emotional reaction, not a rational one. i know mozilla, despite its problems, is faaaar from being as bad as google to be clear i don’t hate mozilla, i do hate google, and i feel like the hate mozilla gets is way overblown, even if their actions are disappointing permalink fedilink source parent [–] djsoren19@yiffit.net -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Only viable competitor is a bizarre thing to drop when browsers like Opera exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* Built on chromium. permalink fedilink source parent [–] yamanii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Don't you think they dabbled on stupid projects and acquired some companies like pocket precisely because just a browser wasn't enough to pay the bills? permalink fedilink source parent [–] uis@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago That's why Mozilla Foundation shouldn't have created Mozilla Corporation in first place. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 138 points 2 years ago* (7 children) They’ve undoubtedly been preparing for this day in some capacity. If they didn’t and collapse then yes they chose a stupid business model. But until that happens I think this is a premature statement. It is shocking to me how many people on Lemmy hate Firefox, which is basically the only real non-chromium alternative that most people can use with minimal compromises. So many people hate Google here yet y’all seem to hate the only viable competitor even more. It’s bizarre to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] grue@lemmy.world 108 points 2 years ago (3 children) It is shocking to me how many people on Lemmy hate Firefox Although some people are Google fanbois or reactionary dumbasses, I think most of what you're misinterpreting as "Firefox hate" is actually love for Firefox and hate for what Mozilla has done to it. Most Firefox-critics' feelings towards it are more like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 44 points 2 years ago Love the browser, hate the corpos desperately trying to fuck it up because that's the cool thing to do to your software now days. permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I remember building Phoenix from source when it was basically still an experiment to decouple it from the suite. Good times. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 point 2 years ago Yes. 😢 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) Consider that many of the same people think of Arch as a viable daily driver distro for the everyman. Some folks are more accepting of jank than others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 years ago Those are just people who forgot what it was like to not be confident/super knowledgeable with computers and have lost the ability to talk about how to help “the average” user. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) this does mystify me. only time I nearly dropped firefox was when they did the big change that broke add ons but firefox with the addons I like is the best browser for me. nothing they have done has been consequentially bad. philosophically maybe but the actual effect is not bad compared to any other options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I think people make a way too big of a deal out of the “Google is the default search engine” thing. If you are worried about that, you can turn it off with like two clicks. For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it and I would’ve done the same exact thing. Besides that I just don’t think there is enough reason to be so anti-Firefox. Especially given our current internet climate. And for those who really are that adamant, there are plenty of forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it. Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately "overpaying" on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don't want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too. Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 17 points 2 years ago I always got the opposite impression: people here love Firefox. But it seems that's part of why they're critical of its shortcomings. At least for me, if I'm criticizing something, it probably means I care at least a little bit about whatever I'm criticizing. Not worth time talking about things I actually dislike. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago I don't think people hate Firefox as much as people hate Mozilla and what they're doing with Firefox. permalink fedilink source parent [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) its an emotional reaction. google has always been bad, them doing a bad thing is just business as usual. who cares but when mozilla does something bad? mozilla is supposed to be the good guy! they betrayed us! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I’d like you to show me how Mozilla is operating on the same evil level as Google. There’s no way you can make that argument. And yes “less bad” by orders of magnitude is way better and enough for me to use Firefox over Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago* its an emotional reaction, not a rational one. i know mozilla, despite its problems, is faaaar from being as bad as google to be clear i don’t hate mozilla, i do hate google, and i feel like the hate mozilla gets is way overblown, even if their actions are disappointing permalink fedilink source parent [–] djsoren19@yiffit.net -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Only viable competitor is a bizarre thing to drop when browsers like Opera exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* Built on chromium. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] grue@lemmy.world 108 points 2 years ago (3 children) It is shocking to me how many people on Lemmy hate Firefox Although some people are Google fanbois or reactionary dumbasses, I think most of what you're misinterpreting as "Firefox hate" is actually love for Firefox and hate for what Mozilla has done to it. Most Firefox-critics' feelings towards it are more like this: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Sabata11792@ani.social 44 points 2 years ago Love the browser, hate the corpos desperately trying to fuck it up because that's the cool thing to do to your software now days. permalink fedilink source parent [–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I remember building Phoenix from source when it was basically still an experiment to decouple it from the suite. Good times. permalink fedilink source parent [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 point 2 years ago Yes. 😢 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 44 points 2 years ago Love the browser, hate the corpos desperately trying to fuck it up because that's the cool thing to do to your software now days. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago I remember building Phoenix from source when it was basically still an experiment to decouple it from the suite. Good times. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 child) Consider that many of the same people think of Arch as a viable daily driver distro for the everyman. Some folks are more accepting of jank than others. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 years ago Those are just people who forgot what it was like to not be confident/super knowledgeable with computers and have lost the ability to talk about how to help “the average” user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 years ago Those are just people who forgot what it was like to not be confident/super knowledgeable with computers and have lost the ability to talk about how to help “the average” user. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) this does mystify me. only time I nearly dropped firefox was when they did the big change that broke add ons but firefox with the addons I like is the best browser for me. nothing they have done has been consequentially bad. philosophically maybe but the actual effect is not bad compared to any other options. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I think people make a way too big of a deal out of the “Google is the default search engine” thing. If you are worried about that, you can turn it off with like two clicks. For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it and I would’ve done the same exact thing. Besides that I just don’t think there is enough reason to be so anti-Firefox. Especially given our current internet climate. And for those who really are that adamant, there are plenty of forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it. Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately "overpaying" on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don't want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too. Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago* (2 children) I think people make a way too big of a deal out of the “Google is the default search engine” thing. If you are worried about that, you can turn it off with like two clicks. For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it and I would’ve done the same exact thing. Besides that I just don’t think there is enough reason to be so anti-Firefox. Especially given our current internet climate. And for those who really are that adamant, there are plenty of forks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it. Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately "overpaying" on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don't want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too. Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 child) oh yeah. duck duck go is for my firefox. duck duck go is another one with a lot of drama that amounts to nothing. have tried a few alts but went back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago Same. DDG is fine/flawed, google is terrible (morally and otherwise) and the results are actively getting worse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) For the money they are (were I guess) handed to set that it’s clearly worth it. Not disagreeing with you. I just want to point out that Google is probably deliberately "overpaying" on this Mozilla deal, because they want to keep Firefox afloat, because they don't want to catch a court ruling that they are monopolizing the browser market too. Dirty tricks with web browsers is the antitrust charge that actually caught Microsoft in the 90s. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago I mean let Google play their stupid game and cash the checks. I understand the moral question here but in reality we make compromises, and that compromise didn’t fundamentally break Firefox or make it suddenly untrustworthy. This has always been out in the open and with clear, simple consequences. Mozilla/Firefox get money, Google is default (but easily changeable) search engine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 17 points 2 years ago I always got the opposite impression: people here love Firefox. But it seems that's part of why they're critical of its shortcomings. At least for me, if I'm criticizing something, it probably means I care at least a little bit about whatever I'm criticizing. Not worth time talking about things I actually dislike. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago I don't think people hate Firefox as much as people hate Mozilla and what they're doing with Firefox. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) its an emotional reaction. google has always been bad, them doing a bad thing is just business as usual. who cares but when mozilla does something bad? mozilla is supposed to be the good guy! they betrayed us! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I’d like you to show me how Mozilla is operating on the same evil level as Google. There’s no way you can make that argument. And yes “less bad” by orders of magnitude is way better and enough for me to use Firefox over Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago* its an emotional reaction, not a rational one. i know mozilla, despite its problems, is faaaar from being as bad as google to be clear i don’t hate mozilla, i do hate google, and i feel like the hate mozilla gets is way overblown, even if their actions are disappointing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child) I’d like you to show me how Mozilla is operating on the same evil level as Google. There’s no way you can make that argument. And yes “less bad” by orders of magnitude is way better and enough for me to use Firefox over Chrome. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago* its an emotional reaction, not a rational one. i know mozilla, despite its problems, is faaaar from being as bad as google to be clear i don’t hate mozilla, i do hate google, and i feel like the hate mozilla gets is way overblown, even if their actions are disappointing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 2 years ago* its an emotional reaction, not a rational one. i know mozilla, despite its problems, is faaaar from being as bad as google to be clear i don’t hate mozilla, i do hate google, and i feel like the hate mozilla gets is way overblown, even if their actions are disappointing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net -5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Only viable competitor is a bizarre thing to drop when browsers like Opera exist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* Built on chromium. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* Built on chromium. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Don't you think they dabbled on stupid projects and acquired some companies like pocket precisely because just a browser wasn't enough to pay the bills? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago That's why Mozilla Foundation shouldn't have created Mozilla Corporation in first place. permalink fedilink source parent