you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -30 points 2 years ago (9 children)

This context just makes you both look silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That is a false equivalence as I did not state hate speech

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I'm not sure how this is hate speech from nutomic? They're not necessarily saying anything bad about trans people as far as I can see, only that the bourgeoisie have nothing to do with it? Or what am I missing here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Looks at the terms they used.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Ok sorry I'm not seeing it, which terms? Genuinely asking

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    “Biological men” is a transphobic term to describe trans women

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I'm not saying nutomic isn't a raging tankie and transphobe (they definitely are as per the post) but I don't see how saying biological male is the transphobic part?

    There is much more obvious transphobia to point out here such as the claim that "the trans agenda" is being pushed by "the bourgeoisie". Last time I checked trans people experience intense discrimination which makes it very hard for them to be part of "the bourgeoisie", and a majority of media pushing against trans people is 110% owned by "the bourgeoisie"

  • source
  • parent