▲ 108 ▼ Truly independent web browser (github.com) submitted 2 years ago by Gargari@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) oh yeah also js isn't very usable yet so that improves privacy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* To be fair, it is quite possible to fingerprint you pretty well without any JS at all, both inside and outside of html/css. And disabling javascript is certainly something that not many people do, so already that makes you stand out even more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 1 point 2 years ago Lol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling. Because, it's not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it's just js that ladybird seems to have issues with permalink fedilink source parent
[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* To be fair, it is quite possible to fingerprint you pretty well without any JS at all, both inside and outside of html/css. And disabling javascript is certainly something that not many people do, so already that makes you stand out even more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 1 point 2 years ago Lol, but also JS being volatile in the current browser makes it easier to fingerprint. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago* (1 child) Btw, how much of HTML features do they support yet? I found nothing googling. Because, it's not that you support HTML 4 or 5 but how much of it. I think QtWebkit is still ahead of Blink and Gecko there, but less performant. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it's just js that ladybird seems to have issues with permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago idk, but from my testing pure html and css seem to work pretty well. it's just js that ladybird seems to have issues with permalink fedilink source parent