Comradeship // Freechat

2161 readers

233 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What are some non-ML movements (past and present) that you guys strongly support? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

106 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Me personally, I find the EZLN fascinating. (if there is anything bad about them, let me know because I do not know much bad things about them)

They are one of the few movements that anarchists praise that I actually think are based, although the Zapatistas have told westerners to stop calling them anarchists, communists, or anything else.

They also fight against drug cartels and seem to have created one of the most stable territories in the Chiapas region.

However, they are too small to do anything big like overthrowing the Mexican government. They would be crushed quickly.

Give me your thoughts on the EZLN and/or, as the title suggests, any non-ML movements that you support.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have before, but the reduction in alcohol drinking primarily came from the restriction, rationing, and lack of ingredients during WW1 and WW2 as opposed to Prohibition. It had a worse inverse effect, all it did was force drinking underground and made it a taboo topic to discuss.

Prohibition increased alcohol stockpiling which allowed most people to “ride out” the initial wave, and by the time many stockpiles ran dry, the mob and local moonshiners has established a strong enough network to maintain supply.

Funnily enough, one bar stockpiled so much alcohol prior to prohibition, that they were able to legally sell and advertise their alcohol for the entire prohibition since it was legal to sell Pre-Prohibiton alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess prohibition didn’t really succeed, but it doesn’t mean it wasn’t worth supporting.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd rather support the prohibition of advertising alcohol. That alone would probably destroy the market in a generation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. Target alcohol as the cigarette industry was targeted.

Don't ban it, but associate it in people's minds with cancer, pain, alcoholism, drunk driving, death.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like any sort of prohibition is one of those things that sound incredible on paper, but rarely have any logistical or material chance in succeeding, and end in an ultimate failure.

It’s better to undermine the societal and cultural mechanisms that purport the problems posed by things like drugs, sex, and alcohol; rather then trying to magically ban it and create a criminal element out of a portion of the population.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sex is a problem! Volcel gang!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Volcel Police Vs the Sex Workers Union

A battle for the ages.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

synthesis: give sex workers union, as people who have been directly exposed to the negative effects of sex, unilateral control over society