you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Which would make it a more extreme position than his position in this election, so the point stands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I agree... I was simply clarifying that Nate Silver did NOT predict that Hillary would win (nor is he predicting that Trump will win this election), which is a common misunderstanding about probability. For these types of models to be meaningful to the public, there needs to be literacy on what is meant by the percentages given. Really, I'm just reinforcing rodneylives' point from another angle!

  • source
  • parent