820
I just cited myself. (mander.xyz)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
236 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In this context, yes, because of the cancellation on the fractions when you recover.

1/3 x 3 = 1

I would say without the context, there is an infinitesimal difference. The approximation solution above essentially ignores the problem which is more of a functional flaw in base 10 than a real number theory issue

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The context doesn't make a difference

    In base 10 --> 1/3 is 0.333...

    In base 12 --> 1/3 is 0.4

    But they're both the same number.

    Base 10 simply is not capable of displaying it in a concise format. We could say that this is a notation issue. No notation is perfect. Base 10 has some confusing implications

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    This seems to be conflating 0.333...3 with 0.333... One is infinitesimally close to 1/3, the other is a decimal representation of 1/3. Indeed, if 1-0.999... resulted in anything other than 0, that would necessarily be a number with more significant digits than 0.999... which would mean that the ... failed to be an infinite repetition.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent