you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

What I'm getting at is taxonomy. A valid taxon has to include all descendents of the crown group. That means that for monkeys to constitute a valid taxon, apes must be included. Same reason why birds are technically dinosaurs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    A monophyletic clade must include all descendants. A taxonomic group itself can hold anything.

    Viruses can also integrate DNA into cells and it sticks there forever sometimes, thus bypassing the tree entirely (making it a network, i.e. no longer acyclic thus no longer a tree).

    There is a lot of weirdness in the world, stranger than people have dreamed.:-P

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fair enough. I just belong to the people who require a valid taxon to be monophyletic. (Btw., "clade" already implies monophyleti...city? Monophyleticness?)

    Also, shut up about viruses, they make a mess of everything and are beautifully chaotic and I hate them and I love them. xD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments