this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
110 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

17717 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
110
Maven Imported 1.12 Million Fediverse Posts (wedistribute.org)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Maven, a new social network backed by OpenAI's Sam Altman, found itself in a controversy today when it imported a huge amount of posts and profiles from the Fediverse, and then ran AI analysis to alter the content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They're called DMs not PMs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

PM never implied any form of end to end encryption. It only ever meant people couldn't see it apart from site operators. I genuinely don't believe people thought it meant otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

But on a federated system, everyone can see all messages. That's expected.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

No, should just be your instance admin and the admin of the instance your messaging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're called DMs not PMs

? Did you mean that the other way around? And if you did... forgive me, I don't really use Mastodon. I was never much of a twitter fan. I don't really like how all of my likes are public (although I guess I have had to get used to that with Lemmy).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No. They're direct. They're not private.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ah, I see. So it's the same mistake that Lemmy users make when thinking that Upvotes/Downvotes aren't public.

It sounds like DMs on Mastodon are public, but are commonly mistaken to be private then?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I don't know why anyone would think any of this stuff is private. It can be pseudonyms, but that's up to you.