▲ 433 ▼ NEW POLL: Nearly Half Believe Trump Should Drop Campaign Over Guilty Verdict (www.mediaite.com) submitted 2 years ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cor@slrpnk.net 63 points 2 years ago (4 children) youtube videos are not polls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] meco03211@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you sure? I know someone on Facebook that seems to think YouTube videos are irrefutable evidence of pretty much whatever they claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago yeah, i saw this youtube video about how they’re very unreliable permalink fedilink source parent [–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The like/dislike ratio used to be a poll of sorts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago i stand by my prior statement permalink fedilink source parent [–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) He discusses actual polls you can look up? This isn't a video just saying things it has data permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) videos that mention data i could look up is exactly what i’m talking about… gimme the data, not some schmoo talking about how they misunderstand some data…. there are infinite, strongly opinionated, youtube videos for every conclusion that inaccurately represents some sort of data…. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Nope, if it's a youtube video then it's garbage on youtube that I'm not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization's website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cor@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago apt username permalink fedilink source parent [–] takeda@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* In the first minute of the video he talks about the pool done by Echelon Insights where they actually checked the exact same people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 child) Are you sure? I know someone on Facebook that seems to think YouTube videos are irrefutable evidence of pretty much whatever they claim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago yeah, i saw this youtube video about how they’re very unreliable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cor@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago yeah, i saw this youtube video about how they’re very unreliable permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) The like/dislike ratio used to be a poll of sorts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago i stand by my prior statement permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cor@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago i stand by my prior statement permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) He discusses actual polls you can look up? This isn't a video just saying things it has data permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cor@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) videos that mention data i could look up is exactly what i’m talking about… gimme the data, not some schmoo talking about how they misunderstand some data…. there are infinite, strongly opinionated, youtube videos for every conclusion that inaccurately represents some sort of data…. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Nope, if it's a youtube video then it's garbage on youtube that I'm not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization's website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cor@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago apt username permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cor@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) videos that mention data i could look up is exactly what i’m talking about… gimme the data, not some schmoo talking about how they misunderstand some data…. there are infinite, strongly opinionated, youtube videos for every conclusion that inaccurately represents some sort of data…. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Nope, if it's a youtube video then it's garbage on youtube that I'm not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization's website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cor@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago apt username permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children) By that logic any article from a news distributor is garbage. Which while true, you can find the original story from a new wire. Sourcing points is key but having someone write a table of authorities when they can link a video with their thoughts and data is fine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Nope, if it's a youtube video then it's garbage on youtube that I'm not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization's website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cor@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago apt username permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Nope, if it's a youtube video then it's garbage on youtube that I'm not gonna watch. A link to a reputable news organization's website says a hell of a lot more about its credibility, every time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* In the first minute of the video he talks about the pool done by Echelon Insights where they actually checked the exact same people. permalink fedilink source parent