Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

If your issue with the result is plagiarism, what would have been a non-plagiarizing way to reproduce the information? Should the system not have reproduced the information at all? If it shouldn't reproduce things it learned, what is the system supposed to do?

Or is the issue that it reproduced an idea that it probably only read once? I'm genuinely not sure, and the original comment doesn't have much to go on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    The normal way to reproduce information which can only be found in a specific source would be to cite that source when quoting or paraphrasing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    But the system isn't designed for that, why would you expect it to do so? Did somebody tell the OP that these systems work by citing a source, and the issue is that it doesn't do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    But the system isn’t designed for that, why would you expect it to do so?

    It, uh... sounds like the flaw is in the design of the system, then? If the system is designed in such a way that it can't help but do unethical things, then maybe the system is not good to have.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    "[massive deficiency] isn't a flaw of the program because it's designed to have that deficiency"

    it is a problem that it plagiarizes, how does saying "it's designed to plagiarize" help????

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments