1611
Linux Inventor Says He Doesn’t Believe in Crypto (u.today)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
652 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I actually considered a non-governmental, community regulated currency as a pretty good idea.

That goes against the entire history of currencies. Every successful currency in history has been controlled by either the state or a religion (which was effectively state-like).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (7 children)

    That goes against the entire history of currencies.

    How come? Decentralized currencies were in place long before the dictators enforced their own private currencies on to all their subjects.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    Decentralized currencies were in place

    Uh huh... like when?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    gold

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Gold isn't a currency, it's a commodity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    You can use it as a currency. The fact that the metal has a material use case isn't really relevant.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    It doesn't meet the requirements to be a currency. It's a commodity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It does go against the history of currency. And most of that history tells us why it’s a good idea to democratize currency.

    It’s also an impractical idea because most governments would not be happy about it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    And most of that history tells us why it’s a good idea to democratize currency.

    No... that history tells us that currency only exists when there's a state / religion in control. There's no reason for currency without a state / religion. Not only would it not work, it's also unnecessary.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent