▲ 842 ▼ Most people are only half-listening (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Soundhole@lemm.ee 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't surprise me to learn that the guy at the weed shop doesn't know WTF he's talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 26 points 2 years ago Nobody at the dispensary knows anything about marijuana. You just get the same canned responses with every question. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago (4 children) I overheard a budtender say that at my local dispensary too lol. Must be a marketing incentive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) "budtender" is that what we call weed dealers now? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've kind of understood "dealer" to be someone who sells illegal drugs, and "budtender" to be someone who works the counter at a legal dispensary. I dunno for sure, I don't actually encounter these concepts often. It does seem kind of silly, I mean we already have words that describe people who work in stores. On the other hand, it's specific and easily understood from the first hearing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago oh my god! it's a real word. I thought it was a typo. I have never heard of it before, since Marijuana is not legal where I live. I learned something. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago A dealer is Packer and a budtender is Dwight. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 2 years ago This is how the gray goo end of the world happens. Nano tech infused weed brownies. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gmtom@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children) I mean, he /could/ be right. He probably isn't but he could be. Nano technology doesn't refer exclusively to like nano robots it could also just be infused with nano particles of something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well, there's a lot of particles that are "nano" in size. And "nano" isn't a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. So the meaning is irrelevant when earth is a nano "particle" (on the parsec scale). Meaningless jibber jabber. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. Thank you for the pointless pedantry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago* Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Got that billy gates up in ya permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 child) It doesn't surprise me to learn that the guy at the weed shop doesn't know WTF he's talking about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] JCreazy@midwest.social 26 points 2 years ago Nobody at the dispensary knows anything about marijuana. You just get the same canned responses with every question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 26 points 2 years ago Nobody at the dispensary knows anything about marijuana. You just get the same canned responses with every question. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago (4 children) I overheard a budtender say that at my local dispensary too lol. Must be a marketing incentive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) "budtender" is that what we call weed dealers now? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've kind of understood "dealer" to be someone who sells illegal drugs, and "budtender" to be someone who works the counter at a legal dispensary. I dunno for sure, I don't actually encounter these concepts often. It does seem kind of silly, I mean we already have words that describe people who work in stores. On the other hand, it's specific and easily understood from the first hearing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago oh my god! it's a real word. I thought it was a typo. I have never heard of it before, since Marijuana is not legal where I live. I learned something. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago A dealer is Packer and a budtender is Dwight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (3 children) "budtender" is that what we call weed dealers now? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've kind of understood "dealer" to be someone who sells illegal drugs, and "budtender" to be someone who works the counter at a legal dispensary. I dunno for sure, I don't actually encounter these concepts often. It does seem kind of silly, I mean we already have words that describe people who work in stores. On the other hand, it's specific and easily understood from the first hearing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago oh my god! it's a real word. I thought it was a typo. I have never heard of it before, since Marijuana is not legal where I live. I learned something. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago A dealer is Packer and a budtender is Dwight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) I've kind of understood "dealer" to be someone who sells illegal drugs, and "budtender" to be someone who works the counter at a legal dispensary. I dunno for sure, I don't actually encounter these concepts often. It does seem kind of silly, I mean we already have words that describe people who work in stores. On the other hand, it's specific and easily understood from the first hearing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago oh my god! it's a real word. I thought it was a typo. I have never heard of it before, since Marijuana is not legal where I live. I learned something. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago oh my god! it's a real word. I thought it was a typo. I have never heard of it before, since Marijuana is not legal where I live. I learned something. Thanks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago A dealer is Packer and a budtender is Dwight. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 2 years ago This is how the gray goo end of the world happens. Nano tech infused weed brownies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children) I mean, he /could/ be right. He probably isn't but he could be. Nano technology doesn't refer exclusively to like nano robots it could also just be infused with nano particles of something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well, there's a lot of particles that are "nano" in size. And "nano" isn't a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. So the meaning is irrelevant when earth is a nano "particle" (on the parsec scale). Meaningless jibber jabber. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. Thank you for the pointless pedantry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago* Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) Well, there's a lot of particles that are "nano" in size. And "nano" isn't a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. So the meaning is irrelevant when earth is a nano "particle" (on the parsec scale). Meaningless jibber jabber. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. Thank you for the pointless pedantry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago* Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix. Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. Thank you for the pointless pedantry permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 years ago Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago* Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Got that billy gates up in ya permalink fedilink source parent