▲ 2552 ▼ Voyager 1 (mander.xyz) submitted 2 years ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 179 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) If they were it wouldn't be Windows permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 33 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Windows 13 update log: Change kernel to Linux. Build custom OS for astrophysics and space science applications. happy rocket engineer noises permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jnk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now I'm curious. How would a NasaOS look like? Would it even be good for general use? Would they just focus on optimization? Could they finally beat Hannah Montana linux, the superior OS? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago I think it would have a real time kernel running parallel to a linux kernel. Users could interact with the linux kernel normally and schedule trusted real time tasks on the other. Maybe there is reduced security for added performance on those cores. In general use it would be a normal stable system with the allure of a performance mode that will break your system if you are not careful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 33 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Windows 13 update log: Change kernel to Linux. Build custom OS for astrophysics and space science applications. happy rocket engineer noises permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jnk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now I'm curious. How would a NasaOS look like? Would it even be good for general use? Would they just focus on optimization? Could they finally beat Hannah Montana linux, the superior OS? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago I think it would have a real time kernel running parallel to a linux kernel. Users could interact with the linux kernel normally and schedule trusted real time tasks on the other. Maybe there is reduced security for added performance on those cores. In general use it would be a normal stable system with the allure of a performance mode that will break your system if you are not careful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jnk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Now I'm curious. How would a NasaOS look like? Would it even be good for general use? Would they just focus on optimization? Could they finally beat Hannah Montana linux, the superior OS? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago I think it would have a real time kernel running parallel to a linux kernel. Users could interact with the linux kernel normally and schedule trusted real time tasks on the other. Maybe there is reduced security for added performance on those cores. In general use it would be a normal stable system with the allure of a performance mode that will break your system if you are not careful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago I think it would have a real time kernel running parallel to a linux kernel. Users could interact with the linux kernel normally and schedule trusted real time tasks on the other. Maybe there is reduced security for added performance on those cores. In general use it would be a normal stable system with the allure of a performance mode that will break your system if you are not careful. permalink fedilink source parent
