-2
CSIS now says that China’s control over gallium is a national security threat for US (features.csis.org)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Plays stupid games, win stupid prizes as the saying goes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Just because you can't read or interpret most of the articles or dara you spew out doesn't mean the rest of us are similarly challenged.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Oh, I think you've given us plenty of proof of just how challenged you are. Your lack of self awareness is just a cherry on top. You're like the embodiment of the Dunning-Kruger syndrome.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Well, of course you think that. From the false data you constantly propagandize, you demonstrably believe that no means yes and 1 = 4

    Telling that Dunning-Kruger is the first technical term you bring up that you might actually know the definition of.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, any data that you don't like is obviously false. 😂

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Any data that is not independently verified (ie, your hopeful propaganda), I don't like.

    Unlike you, I don't chill for a single entity, I simply like people to be properly and fairly informed.

    You can refer back to the article that has actual data from multiple countries that count the number of false data used in Chinese scientific articles. If you're confused about actual data versus wishful thinking.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, CSIS, a famous Chinese propaganda outlet. 😂

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, purporting an argument for another since you can't counter their actual point.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is no actual point to counter. You're evidently claiming that CSIS data is not reliable and called it Chinese propaganda. I can't believe you provide this level of entertainment at no charge.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Whatever your reason for doubting CSIS is, dont attributed to me. You have plenty on your plate as it is without making up claims by others.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not the one doubting CSIS who made the report that China's gallium restriction are a national security threat to US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Well, if you read reports from more than one country, you might not blindly believe every headline you specifically search for.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Really should take your own advice there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm constantly questioning myself. That's why it's so easy for me to discredit your propaganda.

    You might want to read the articles connected to some of those headlines you frantically copy and paste, and then look for corroborating verified articles from a different source. Yhen, come to your own conclusion that cannot be refuted according to the data you've gathered(stop making unverifiable claims that are so easily refuted is a good first step), and you might actually be able to make a coherent post!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    If you think that making glib comments full of personal attacks is what discrediting means then you're about as smart as I thought you were.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Jesus you're prolific and ubiquitous.

    You win the glib trophy on this branch. Not them.

    You really need to check yourself. You are galvanizing people into positions you want them to move off of. Are you doing this on purpose?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -5 points 3 years ago*

    And here you are again. I don't expect the other commenter to move off their position, it's pretty clear they're as galvanized as it gets at this point. There is no productive discussion possible there. I don't know why you'd pretend otherwise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Personal attacks? That's your style(you've said "your shithole country, dummy, sniffing glue". I attack propaganda.

    Keep it up though, it is funny when you prove yourself wrong like this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -4 points 3 years ago

    I follow a simple principle of engaging people on their level. When you sealion into my threads to make vapid comments and personal attacks, don't be surprised when you get called out for it. What's really funny is that I live rent free in your head, and you follow me around like a lost puppy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent