this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
-28 points (32.9% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4607 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

you don’t care about anyone other than yourself.

this is a leap of logic

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

People downvoting you apparently don't believe anyone on Lemmy is:

  1. Not a US citizen.
  2. 17 or younger come November.
  3. An ex-con in a state where that means you can't vote.
  4. A current convict unable to vote from prison.

1 and 2 get me the most. Imagine not believing in Italians or children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm a leftist and I don't vote for capitalists or war criminals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If you're legally allowed to vote in the USA, you almost certainly do vote for capitalists, largely due to fundamental flaws in First Past the Post - you have no way not to. Both abstaining from voting and voting third party are mathematically equivalent to voting for a capitalist, it just makes it messier working out which one you voted for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Both abstaining from vot8ng and voting third party are mathematically equivalent to voting for a capitalist

no, they're not. calling your storytelling "math" doesn't change its veracity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, they are. Obstinately refusing to understand the mathematics of voting doesn't change the math.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

i've seen explications before, but i'm open to the possibility that you have a novel theory that is testable, falsifiable, and valid.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Dude. I'm not talking about people outside of the US. What is so complicated about that. This is a US centric country conversation. I thought it was implied that the people I was speaking about would be US citizens.

Here, I will clarify with everyone who has a hard time reading between the lines.

IF YOU ARE A US CITIZEN THAT CAN LEGALLY VOTE AND YOU CHOOSE TO USE YOUR VOTE IN A MANNER THAT WILL ULTIMATELY DESTROY MY PERSONAL FREEDOMS AND FURTHER THE SUFFERING OF OTHER PEOPLE FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC, I WOULD RATHER NOT ASSOCIATE WITH YOU.