▲ 196 ▼ Developer Explains Why Explicit Sync Will Finally Solve the NVIDIA/Wayland Issues (9to5linux.com) submitted 2 years ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml 41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) AMD on Linux doesn't need explicit sync permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Cool. It should still use it though. If for nothing else than the parallelization improvements it allows. If we stuck with the "it works fine so I'm not moving away from it" approach then we'd all still be on x11. Nvidia sucks and they should be more of a team player, but I think they were right to push for explicit sync over implicit. We should've been doing this from the beginning on wayland. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago Cool. It should still use it though. If for nothing else than the parallelization improvements it allows. If we stuck with the "it works fine so I'm not moving away from it" approach then we'd all still be on x11. Nvidia sucks and they should be more of a team player, but I think they were right to push for explicit sync over implicit. We should've been doing this from the beginning on wayland. permalink fedilink source parent