"Our new $20 note is both visually stunning and more secure than ever."

Yeah, they're nice enough as a bank note goes, but I think "visually stunning" is a bit of an overstatement.

Maybe I just too old, but I think there will always be a place for physical deliveries, and that all households should be able to receive them. There's room to talk about schedule of those deliveries (maybe it's only 2 or 3 days per week, instead of every day), but I believe it should always exist. Mail isn't as important as it was in the "olden days", but receiving deliveries still is, so maybe the business model changes a little.

You're 100% right that electronic communication has heavily eclipsed physical delivery, and it's so critical that I think it should probably be treated with the same mandate - every Canadian should now also have access to a publicly funded digital mailbox in addition to a physical one. I think I recall that at one point in time Canada Post offered a service (or maybe they still do) through which a person's bills could be delivered electronically via Canada Post, but I think it's mostly been superseded by everyone's private e-mail now. But it might be too late - it might become just a novelty e-mail - would the average Canadian migrate from whatever service(s) they use now to Canada Post e-mail? It would need to have some compelling reason to do so, and it would need strong protection as well.

Hot take: I don't care.

I mean, yes, the business should be run efficiently and they should embrace continuous improvement; yes, they should explore additional lines of business in the public interest (Canada Post all-Canadian e-mail anyone? VPS? Hosting? Mobile phone? Storage Lockers?).

But, their core mandate is, and should be, to keep all people living in Canada connected and in communication, no matter how remotely located they are in the country. And in my opinion, the same quality of service for all people, too. So, yeah, profitability will suffer, and the capitalists will be unhappy. I think the goal should be quality customer service not maximum profitability.

It's startling and disturbing to me that 20% of people polled believe that "not having enough to eat and live without going into debt" doesn't count as poverty.

I'm also surprised that it's permitted to be so subjective. Even the research author says, "Statistics can tell us how many people fall below a specified threshold. They cannot decide for us where that threshold should be drawn." I disagree. No-one should be choosing amongst sufficient shelter, food, and utilities every month. Or week. Or day. Spend some time visiting with people below various "statistical thresholds", and it should be fairly obvious.

Actually, then again, maybe don't. Because many politicians, seeing a heavily stoned person sharing a dirty bedroom in a crowded drug-positive tenement, learning they spend 90% of the pittance they earn or receive on self-harm, not understanding that a 6 week rehab program won't turn them into corporate executives, not understanding the terrible spiralling self-hate cycle they're caught in, would simply dismiss them as subhumans beyond hope so not worth the investment.

A struggling average middle-class family is something they can parse and comprehend, and know they're likely to vote, so can pander and glad-hand to them to maintain a political career.

I've used PartsAvatar.ca, TheWrenchMonkey.ca, TDotPerformance.ca, and don't forget good old Canadian Tire - I'd never let them work on my car, but I've bought parts.