How do you hate western philosophy if the only philosopher you'd read is a western socio-economic political theorist?

I was at a pride march early sunmer and there was a "Iranian government protest" that I randomly came across. What made it clear for me that these 'protests' are influence campaigns by some other state were the music was pure AI (it sounded exactly like "we are charlie kirk"), a pride flag, a Israeli flag, and a Ukrainian flag. Waving a USA flag would have looked like it was in its natural habitat.

Seeing all the people holding lion and sun flags listening to an american AI song wailing about some bullshit and I don't know how anyone can believe these protests aren't orchestrated by some foreign government. There's nothing genuine about them!

Thats where I was hoping you can expand, comrade! If we still rely on the wage system, where others are paid more for their contribution beyond the common needs of others to pay for luxuries then I don't know how revolutionary the future's day to day will be. I struggle to see if the money-wage system is still in place how different it would be from today. The then joyful task of tallying and monitoring and weighing and counting and judging the individual contributions of all at scale with I expect the office to do all this work (and then enforcing and punishing and shaming?) then we are not really too far away from how the world works today. But the challenge of reward or punishment to work is a difficult one, so that's where I'd love if people can give some insights, as my view is very pessimistic in that form of labor relations.

Today, festivals are luxurious, expensive, and artificially constrained to extract the most amount of capital for the least amount of effort. The idea then is to maintain a fine line from extractive food-drink prices, entry-stay fees, artist-lineup attractiveness, and to make as much profit and maintain as much of a reputation to do it all again. In a communist society, extracting money for profit is not the goal, and the luxurious nature of organising cultural events for society should be seen differently. We're quite biased to the monopolies of festivals today and need to lean much more towards something like Aste Nagusia in Euskal Herria (basque country), you'll love its revolutionary character.

The "extraction of surplus-value" is a, if not the, defining characteristic of capitalism, and a eureka moment in Marxist theory. I am interested in then how this productive force use converted into surplus 'value' - meaning working beyond the needs of society and our collective plan for the betterment of society to grow. It feels distinctly 'line must go up' so any material you have to help me there would be helpful!

Is there anything further you could expand on or have some more get support on this poiny?

This just sounds like 'money' with a different face, and those that can't contribute will be penalised. This is where I get stuck with any 'contribution' system, as it will involve an ever more complicated system of totalling and tallying and tokens and cheques and so on. If we still are left with a wage system, we've failed.

The 'rank' stars arent even stars.

Slay the spire 2 is a fun game, I can attest to that! Its also multiplayer, so if you have a couple of folk that could join you it adds an extra layer of complexity. I have heard good things of fields of mistria from people who like the cozy games. Apparently the first moonlighter is fun too which might be a nice intro if stardew is nice in theory but tough in practice.

I have only heard good things from pokopia but might not be worth it unless you can find something cheap.

You could also play EU4, I honestly think its one of the best games ever made. The more the merrier ;)

I'm new and learning, thank you for your patience!

This is on me, as you're absolutely correct. I threw an ironic shit post reply to what I assumed was a shitposty channel given the quality of the 'meme' and text ("chat").

Its even worse on my part, with an allusion to violence for no other reason than to perpetuate the woodchipper archetype.

When the motive is profit, or to cement profit's interests through collusion with all arms of capital through "think tanks" and boards, the political scientist is indeed a force for ill. Naturally, it need not be if the interest is in the betterment of the proletariat and the common folk, as demonstrated through scientific socialism which is where the irony was intended to be focused.

The so-called "scientific" socialists will be fed to the fields! /s

What games look interesting to you at the moment?

I bet they're really happy they worked with the US on selling their oil.

I would come back to 'the challenges' people face, as this is where my 'just do it' brain says so what?