top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 228 points 2 years ago (71 children)

There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance. The question came up about EVs. There were discussions about how to include EVs in the taxation system so they would pay for their fair share of the road. One of the options was to impose a tax attached to your vehicle registration based upon the weight of the vehicle. The greater the weight, the more wear and tear it produces on the road surface. This might be one solution to the barrier problem, namely moving the extra cost to the reason for the extra cost.

  • source
  • hideshow 71 child comments
  • [–] 126 points 2 years ago* (41 children)

    The "problem" with that tax is that if it's applied fairly, it gets very big very fast. The damage to the road goes up with weight, but not linearly. Not a square factor, either. Not even cube. It's to the fourth power.

    Start applying that to long haul trucks and the whole industry will be bankrupt in a month. The implication being that we are all subsidizing that industry with taxes on roads. Including that one trucker with a "who is John Galt?" sticker on the back.

    That said, this is also a very good argument for improving cargo trains to the point where most long haul trucking goes away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago

    And frankly, I'm really ok with this.

    Trains should be the backbone for shipping. They are WAY more fuel efficient, like 3 to 4x more efficient than shipping by truck. Rail requires far less maintenance. And there's always the option install a 3rd rail and use electricity instead of fossil fuels to ship.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Speaking of road tax, you know that bad-faith argument about how cyclists need to pay our "fair share?" Well, I would be happy to pay 1¢ for my 10 kg bicycle if everybody with a car had to pay fairly by weight^4^.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Maybe it's because I don't really know anyone passionate on either side of this issue, but I've never heard of this argument. I know you said it's a bad faith argument, but I can't really imagine what a cyclist's fair share would be aside from maybe widening a road to add a bike lane lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    No reason the tax had to scale exactly to match the damage though. At least make it painful enough so people consider whether a larger vehicle is worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (25 replies)
  • [+] 21 points 2 years ago (12 children)
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I think you make want to go the other way. Making tires more expensive wont make people choose smaller cars, they will choose worse tires. And then they will crash into you because they cant stop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    There was a discussion a couple of years ago around gasoline taxes and how they are supposed to pay for roadway maintenance.

    I just want to point out, even if they're supposed to, gas taxes do not pay for roadway maintenance, not by a long shot

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (15 replies)
    [–] 157 points 2 years ago (43 children)

    Yeah well let's quit making 7000 pound consumer vehicles. Small EVs would be more efficient and better for the environment because they need less materials to build and and less energy to recharge.

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago* (20 children)

    Judging by the general trend I don't think this is happening anytime soon. The overall car industry is obsessed with even bigger cars.

    And even in Europe it is sickening to see those half buses on our roads. And this is especially true for big cities, where parking space is very limited and usually those cars occupy park space for 1.5-2 cars.

    And knowing that the fertility rate is really going down I wonder what justifies those cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 113 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Tldr most guard rails are designed to stop vehicles under 5000lbs. Passenger vehicles are starting to exceed that, and EVs can weight 30% more than ICE vehicles.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 92 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    That's 3175 kg for non-free folk. My car has around 1600 kg. 7k pound car is a fat fat cow.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago*

    People are saying "it's all the electric cars and batteries..."

    Yeah my VW ID4 which is a pretty decent sized electric car is 2003kg. You are looking at giant electric SUVs or electric trucks to get over that 3175kg. Even the cybertruck is only 3k and that is just a giant chunk of steel and battery. They must be including hauling weight in that...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 83 points 2 years ago (31 children)

    Just get an even bigger car, it will keep you safe from those.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (24 children)

    I mean... kind of?

    10 or 20 years ago? I would never have driven an SUV and thought anyone in one is stupid.

    Five or six years ago? I needed a new car and ended up getting a "crossover" (so basically a hatchback on a lift kit). Still tiny compared to a lot of the cars on the road but a lot bigger than what I ever expected to drive.

    Because in a sedan (like my rental a few months back)? My head is literally at bumper level for a LOT of the vehicles on the road. And now we have shit like the cybertruck where the bumper is a jagged metal wedge. I have a lot of faith in modern safety specs but that is still terrifying. In my small suv? I am still grill height for a lot of trucks but at least I am not weaving around monster trucks in a clown car.

    Don't get me wrong. I very much enjoy the increased ground clearance and ability to haul an entire car worth of camping gear comfortably. But I also know that I am "never" going to go smaller. And... that is kind of the problem. People are dragged kicking and screaming because the alternative is to feel like you are going to die the next time someone decides they are going to ignore a red light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    I didn't realize until now, but I've been very fortunate to be able to take the bus to work recently, and the lack of fear of other vehicles on the road is probably a huge contributor to how much better I feel after the commute. I have that anxiety ever-present in the back of my mind while driving a sedan.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 43 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    We just need to not have these big ass trucks for the general public. You don’t need a ford 350 with rims jacked up to show you have money. You are a pavement princess.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago*

    7000 Pounds is 3.2 Tons (metric)

    3.2 Tons

    geez, i wonder why these guardrails wouldn't work on a fucking Truck

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This becomes a self-reinforcing cycle. If there are 7000lb passenger trucks on the highway around my compact car, I maybe start wanting to get a larger vehicle myself to protect myself from the idiots who drive them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago

    My first car had a curb weight of 2400 lbs. It's absurd how fucking huge these planet-destroying, environment destroying, life destroying monstrosities have become.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Simple, if you buy a car that's too heavy for the existing infrastructure, you either pay for the improved infrastructure or take the risk yourself. The minivan that I drive the kids in is only 4,300 lb. If you're driving something heavier than that then, best of luck. I expect that if I'm driving a camper, and I fall off the road, I'm just done. Game over.

    I don't expect infrastructure to adapt to the minority. That's not what it's for.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago

    "The goliath-like GMC Hummer EV weighs a staggering 9,083 pounds, 2 tons more than a gas-guzzling H3."

    I’m confused 'Murica, do you want freedom or not?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›