all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Seems like the right approach to start their own server, instead of making accounts on some of the flagship instances, which only perpetuates the centralisation dogma.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    It also does away with some of the really awkward practices news organizations engage in wrt social media. The number of @JournalistNameCBC handles out there is kind of super cringy, and seems to point to journos having company-specific/company-mandated social media accounts, but without any actual company support for them.

    Something like this makes having a company-mandated social media account something they're assigned, just like an email address, rather than something they're personally responsible for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago*

    What I'd love to see is news companies spinning up their own instances, for example, a CBC-owned Mastodon instance, with accounts such as journalistname@cbcnews. It'd work exactly like a company-assigned e-mail address, and would function as such. That each and every post on such an account would be seen as the journalist working under the company, and not their own personal views.

    And if a journalist wants his own personal account, well, they can either spin up their own instance, or perhaps a union of journalists would spin up an instance, with journalists setting up their accounts that are not tied to any news agency or company.

    Am I being too naive and optimistic here? Maybe. But do I want this to happen regardless, yes!


    Upon reading the article more closely, this is what the BBC is doing. My bad!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    When I joined Mastodon in the November migration, I wondered why media organisations weren’t spinning up their own servers. Give all the journos an account on that server and there’s your verification right away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Local isn't a good measure here, though. The BBC local stream is literally just going to be posts by BBC employees.

    The global stream isn't a great measure, either, frankly, as journalists primarily want to yet their posts seen, not see a huge field of noise. Those who are doing digging for social media stories maybe want a wider cut of things, but they can still do that through their replies, and through global. Search just isn't going to be as effective as on generalist servers.

    But then, search isn't super effective on Mastodon, anyway, and all the big generalist servers are running Mastodon.

    There's nothing preventing them from using secondary accounts on .social for research, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    No of course not everyone or every organisation has the means for that. But those that have should, and others should fan out over different instances: local or regional ones, or thematic ones, instead of congregating on the same three instances because it's 'the main one'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I woke to discover this, and immediately defederated it. I don't need that transphobia factory in our timelines

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The BBC is actively transphobic, and regularly publishes transphobic content that stirs up hate. Given that I admin two trans heavy instances, I won't be federating with them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Are there articles you can share?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's pretty widely known and has been an issue for a long time. It's not terribly hard to google for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I've also been looking. I see other websites complaining, but I want to see actual BBC content that's inflamatory etc, as I can't find anything. It must exist, but so far, can't find it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    "Many people have blocked the BBC for posting transphobic content that is harmful to trans folk"

    "Hey, can you please share some of that harmful content?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Well honestly, if it can't be sourced, is it even true? I'm all for burning a media outlet at the stake. But, I'd want to see evidence first. If it can't be found, it's not true for all intent and purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There are links to various articles about it in this discussion tree. You're either not looking hard for sources, or you're being disingenuous. I hope it's the former, but experience tells me it's the latter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ok but not everything revolves around trans people's issues. Can we be glad for a positive development for once, or will we remove everything that does not 100% agree with our view of the world from the fediverse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Defederating isn't irrational, it's not a matter of personal beliefs it's a matter of actual people's lives and being allowed to express themselves. Going against that is inhumane and anyone that does it should be held accountable for their actions. Despite that, mainstream attention direcred towards the fediverse is a positive advancement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Unsurprisingly given its extremely high profile as a purveyor of transphobic coverage, many mastodon instances have greeted them with a firm block. (If this confuses folks who don't pay attention to this sort of thing, just picture in your head if it was fox news.)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    Welcome to the adventure BBC!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    Logical decision on the part of a journalistic medium, given that the fediverse has many more sources of information than a monolithic Big Brother traditional social network with mainstream users.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Man I wish other news organizations would join. Press.coop had a bunch of accounts that were mirroring their twitter feeds but the API change killed them.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    Can you follow mastodon pages on Lemmy?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments