all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 3 years ago

Then why have a public API?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    the reddit mobile app used to be a third party app before it was bought out.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Dude, stop talking. Everything he says just makes it worse

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    What the fuck do you think bots, tools, and plugins are, dumbass?

    Also, post summaries in JSON are much lighter to transmit than HTML, so honestly the fact that you still serve a website at all is more inefficient.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    This is hilarious to say considering reddit:

    a) has had an api to support 3rd party apps since the beginning
    b) went more than a decade before making a 1st party app
    c) the 1st party app is literally based on a 3rd party app they bought out

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    If that were ever the case, they would of brought the leading 3rd-party developers to the table. I don't discredit that he feels they should pay for their API access, I just feel the amount is exhorbant and meant to put them under rather than find an equal financial ground that makes sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Pull the foot from your ass, that you shot yourself in, out of your fucking mouth.

    You greedy piggy baby boy..

    F U C K. U/SPEZ.

    F U C K. U/SPEZ-CEO.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Steve Hoffman Translation: “Reddit was never supposed to be accessible for everyone. For example, blind people. So shut up and start buying shit from these ads”

  • source