top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 149 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Spez really is going full Elon!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I wonder how it'll work on sites like Reddit. Imagine paying for verification only to get downvoted and "silence brand"ed by people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The next step will be preventing downvotes on branded accounts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 145 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Reddit doesn’t seem to understand what their platform is for. If people are adding “reddit” to the end of google searches, it shows that they want brands to talk less, and real people to talk more.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    no no no, they don't want you to use google. They want you to use Reddit search instead, because it's so awesome!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Since when do brands want to be known on Reddit? Isn't the entire point to make a bunch of fake accounts and post positive comments about said brand, to make them look good?

    HEY REDDIT, WHAT'S A BRAND YOU'LL BUY FOR LIFE!?

    Queue the thousands of totally not brand accounts posting why said product is so perfect and you'll never buy any other brand again!

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    For guerrilla marketing techniques sure

    But for official advertisements I imagine they would want to do them on a verified account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Like that disgusting "Samsung AMA" which was just a campaign for their S20-something. They deleted any question that wasn't basically, "what's so cool about [this feature] on the S20-something that I'm planning to get?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    ive seen in the nreal, now xreal, sub where having people from the company to talk to about issues helps. im not trying to market anything but just use an example. i doubt thats what they are going for but it can be a positive side effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That's great news, I'm really digging the slow downfall.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Further proof that Reddit is committed to copying every stupid decision that the Muskrat makes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Every fucking social media company wants to be the same thing. It's boring as shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I guess there will just be a bunch of verified accounts running around doing "organic" marketing for their latest projects now.

    Boy, I am sure glad nobody has ever done that on Lemmy before.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Weren't they already doing that? I swear, you read some posts and it's like a PR team is trying to get a story buried. Like after a Leo DiCaprios dating history got air time you started seeing him in more memes the next days, and TILs about how he was a good actor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I mean he's quite memable and he's a great actor so not sure why both things can't happen...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It really feels like they presented a road map at the beginning of the year and are sticking to it no matter what, neither looking at their own user base nor what is happening in the world of big social media right now.

    It's almost impressive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago

    'we have verified that no brands want to be here, and thus haven't labeled anything'

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This will just make them be down voted to oblivion by default... See EA

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Remember when reddit was people oriented?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago

    That’s cool, I think a lot of us here would label Reddit as verifiably stupid.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Gods I'm glad I left that shithole.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The only way I can believe Reddit is this stupid is if investors are holding a gun to their head and demand profitability.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)

    Silence, brand.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I don't see anything immediately wrong with verification. There are cases where people reach out to companies for support, and having them be verified helps. Tech enthusiasts like us might be less susceptible to phishing/scams, but regular folks aren't.

    However, after everything Reddit has done recently, there's no stopping them from turning this into a status symbol thing like "the website formerly known as Twitter". They could tweak their algorithm to boost comments of "verified" accounts, degrading the quality of conversation there.

  • source
  • Good for them?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›