top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 77 points 2 years ago (51 children)

And hopefully no instance will federate with them... Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Couldn’t just some of y’all defed instead of blocking it wholesale for everyone?

    I thought one of the main perks of federation was user choice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, that's what has always been mentioned, defederated from them, AFAIK there's no way of blocking it completely from the fediverse, so if your instance's admin wants they can decide to not block them and you can interact with meta.

    If your instance defederates and you want to still see their activity then you can choose an instance which is still federated with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I suspect lemm.ee will, but not much beyond that. Hell, theyre still fedded with explodingheads and hexbear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [–] 60 points 2 years ago* (12 children)

    Hi. No one is creating content on Threads, can we steal your content, please?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Threads federation is mostly targeted towards Mastodon than Lemmy, so I highly doubt it will make much of a difference whether any Lemmy instance federates or not, since Lemmy is purely group based and does not federate well with even Mastodon to begin with as there is a huge difference in design philosophy. (Which means I can stay under the radar a bit longer.)

    However, I don't think Facebook will stop at Threads, they are using Threads as a preliminary test, and if it goes well, I think the next step they could do is to get Instagram itself to federate.

    So here is a thought: suppose reddit or Instagram are open to federation, would you say federating with them and getting all their content will be worth it?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago* (34 children)

    RIP open and user owned Internet movement attempt.

    Say Hello to Fediverse+, for only $39.99 a month you can access ad free browsing as your feed is fed only corpo approved posts that have flooded and drowned out any alternative voices.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (28 children)

    I'm don't totally understand the fediverse and how it works. How does meta making one of their options federated harm the rest of the fediverse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    There is zero benefit to engaging with multi-billion dollar companies.

    The harm is they embrace, extend, extinguish the Fediverse and I can easily see the W3C letting them donate and start putting in some features “to protect” the children or media ownership rights or whatever bogus excuse they’ll use to start cracking down on it like every company does every time it gets involved in something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (20 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    And so it begins.....Embrace.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Has mastodon blocked threads? Please block it. Kill that shit and hope thread will take zuckerberg out too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Mastodon.social admin and lead mastodon dev Eugen Rochko signed an NDA with Facebook and has since been in support of Threads' embrace of the Fediverse and asked people to give Facebook a chance. We won't know if he's made some deal (monetary or otherwise) with Facebook due to aformentioned NDA.

    Many instances of the fediverse are anti-Threads despite his shilling though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Fuck SuckerBurg all my homies hate Suckerburg

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [B] 8 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Joining the fediverse — the decentralized world of social media that includes Mastodon, Pixelfed, and other services that all interoperate through ActivityPub — has been on the Threads team’s to-do list since the very beginning.

    Instagram head Adam Mosseri told The Verge in July that he believed decentralizing the platform was key to making it relevant to a new generation of creators.

    Skeptics have long held that Threads would never actually federate, even as Zuckerberg, Mosseri, and others at Meta kept promising they would.

    For the largest and most centralized social service on the web, suddenly throwing open the gates to other platforms seemed like an unlikely pivot.

    This test appears to only cover one small part of a truly federated social network — it doesn’t sound like you’ll be able to post from Mastodon to Threads, for instance, and you can’t move your account between services.

    But the test at least reaffirms Meta’s commitment to ActivityPub and to being part of the broader open social web.


    The original article contains 344 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 52%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›