220
Threads is officially starting to test ActivityPub integration (www.theverge.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Couldn’t just some of y’all defed instead of blocking it wholesale for everyone?

I thought one of the main perks of federation was user choice?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, that's what has always been mentioned, defederated from them, AFAIK there's no way of blocking it completely from the fediverse, so if your instance's admin wants they can decide to not block them and you can interact with meta.

    If your instance defederates and you want to still see their activity then you can choose an instance which is still federated with them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Yeah and we choose you going somewhere else to play with Facebook.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That’s true this place could really use less users.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    This place is growing just fine already, we don’t need to dump 141 million new accounts into it overnight.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (5 children)

    That's not how federation and mastodon works, and you know that very well.

    Simply don't follow anyone on threads if you don't wanna see thread content. But who TF cares where the content comes from?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Embrace, extend, extinguish. They'll play nice with the Fediverse for a while. Maybe years. But then they'll introduce a new feature to the Fediverse as a "good will gesture". Then they'll make features available to only people federated with Threads. Then they'll make features only people on Threads can see. And so on and so forth. We SHOULD care where the content comes from. Platforms that are neutral should be where our content comes from.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago

    You're just describing how the fediverse works. One social network that is partially comparable with another network. Like subscribing to pixelated from mastodon, etc. not all features are available, but some are. Not only is there no such thing as a neutral platform, but the decentralization of mastodon and the fediverse in general is specifically to address that.

    The danger of meta is their data scraping - something they can already do anyway without their own servers being federated.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I care. If I start seeing content from Meta in the fediverse I'll probably just leave.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why? Why are humans who use threads so repulsive to you that you leave an entire federated social network just because some people used a particular server?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It's not because of the humans. Like many other people, I think Facebook/Meta is cancer on society. I don't want anything to do with it.

    I also have other reasons I don't like the fediverse that would make it easier to walk away, especially the political extremism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent