Back side of perovskite panel achieves more than 90 per cent of the efficiency of the front side

top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 3 years ago (1 child)

This is just bifacial and it's been on the market for a little bit already.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ok guys hear me out, what if we make it 3 sided

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I like your way of thinking, but why stop there? 4 sides anyone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Guys, why are we still limiting ourselves to 3 dimensions?

    4D solar panels

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    No no, the solution is clearly to use seven red solar panels, all strictly perpendicular to each other. Oh, and some of them should be transparent so sunlight can reach the others, which should be green to reflect our environmental aspirations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Genuinely curious how the EROI compares to a single sided panel.

    It is generating more electricity. On the flipside (heh) it would cost more energy to produce.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    If the solar panel isn’t facing the sun then how is it generating power?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    From the reflection of the sunlight! Light bounces around everything and everywhere, so while it's not direct sunlight, it's still light. It generates less than the sun facing one but it's still more power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Is it worth the additional cost tho? I guess if you’re limited on space there is no other option, but I feel like I’d rather entertain additional solar panels that are facing the sun than to add additional cost for such a low return.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    Alternatively, you lay them out in north-south rows (like a fence) and they generate most power during morning and evening, when sunshine comes from east and west.

    Coincidentally, their power maximum is when conventional solar parks are not yet producing or no longer producing.

    Coincidentally, this also matches the ideal agrivoltaic setup, where you use almost zero surface (the panels are vertical) and grow plants between, not below solar panels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    So then off reflections? That doesn’t sound very efficient or worth the additional cost if I can just face another solar panel at the sun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Unless you plan on putting up some books and comics for voles and grasshoppers on the backside of those panels, that space is really useless.

    Do not underestimate the importance of land use, it's always been very important and it will be very important in this century.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Bifacial panels have been a thing for several years, mostly in utility-scale solar installations.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    We have bifacial panels, cost was comparable, and rated at ~15% additional output. Now almost 2yrs old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    ...harvests reflected sunlight hitting the back of the device, offering an unconventional route to producing higher energy yields for less space and cost.

    Less cost seems probable. Less space really does not. Gonna probably need some mirrors to reflect onto that back surface, and it's still going to require the same amount of incident area of solar radiation.

    Mirrors are pretty cheap, though. So seems like a win.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    It should have been obvious. A double-sided dildo creates twice as much friction.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›