top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 186 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 71 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    Yep. They really doubled down on privacy/security and it’s pretty admirable. The President doesn’t use an android or a blackberry for a reason. (Well, two in the case of blackberry. Security and existing). If only there were no other problematic areas of Apple’s business (manufacturing, wages, environmental impact).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (15 replies)
  • [–] 64 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    This is one thing Apple has been pretty firm on. You can’t have a secure product and have backdoors. You can try to hide them all you want, but a backdoor will always be a massive security vulnerability.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 32 points 3 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago

    They moved the storage of encryption keys for Chinese users to servers in China instead of shutting down iMessage and Facetime. Quite the different response compared to here.

    I was assuming Apple was posturing until they'd actually have to do something.
    They could well have postured in China as well, before backtracking. I have no Idea if that happened, but it seems reasonable from a PR vs Legal vs business development standpoint.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago*

    They moved the storage of encryption keys for Chinese users to servers in China instead of shutting down iMessage and Facetime.

    These are totally separate things. Apple users in China can still use iMessage and FaceTime and those are still end-to-end encrypted. If you choose to store your iMessages in iCloud, those can be accessed by the government, but that's the same as they can in every other country. The UK's proposal is to directly break the security of iMessage itself, something worse than what China has done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    They moved the storage of encryption keys for Chinese users to servers in China

    No they didn't. iMessage can only be decrypted by keys stored in the secure enclave on your device.

    There are some things that the Chinese government can access. The contents of messages isn't one of them.

    And as for Facetime... those calls aren't recorded at all. Not sure how a legal order is supposed to allow access to data that doesn't even exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Good on them for standing up for what's right on this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    Apple doesn't like be told what to do.

    If privacy is in the way of their desires then Apple will invade their user's privacy. They don't stand for privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Seems like you're spewing FUD to me, mostly. I agree Apple is far from perfect, but they literally introduced an e2e methodology for much of iCloud data recently.

    Besides, even if they are only doing this out of selfish desire, it's still a good thing for the consumers in this case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Good, why should they comprise security. It makes it easier for everyone to hack, not just the government

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    It could already be completely hackable and no one would know because the security in this case is solely based on apples word with zero auditing. If there were a true financial incentive there is no doubt they would compromise "security".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago

    21st century govenrments: Hey guys, why don't we ban math?

    Yeah good luck with that. Gotta give it to Apple on this one, though I'm not a huge fan of their business practices otherwise.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Can we get iMessage on Android in the States tho?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    We have iMessage at home (it's Signal and nobody else uses it)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    they removed the ability to send sms in the app. so I, like many others, moved on to other apps that could handle such a task.

    signal isn't capable of anything other than talking to other signal users. so it's a dead app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [+] 8 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Hope this comes to fruition. Maybe it would help people realize how dumb it is to be locked into these services in the first place.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I'd say good on Apple protecting their users but knowing Apple it's more like they don't want to be told what to do.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›