▲ 683 ▼ Beach party (lemmynsfw.com) submitted 3 years ago by FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com to c/aigen@lemmynsfw.com NSFW 12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ReSordo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) How did you manage to get such great details? Mines seem to be always blurry, or not in focus. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 16 points 3 years ago A few things that I've found help: Increase the resolution. Even when that shouldn't help, it does, if that makes sense. In the negative prompt, describe types of images that aren't photos. Anime, render, cartoon, etc. In the positive prompt, describe a detail that you would only find in a highly detailed image. Some people just write "highly detailed," but that does jack shit because no one's out there tagging photos as "highly detailed." Or they'll say "8k resolution," which works, but it's too limiting and it'll throw off the style too much. In this case, I included "sweaty skin." A photo that captures the texture of skin is going to be highly detailed, and those photos will become the AI's source material. This has the side effect of making the composition rather tightly framed, but that worked here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 16 points 3 years ago A few things that I've found help: Increase the resolution. Even when that shouldn't help, it does, if that makes sense. In the negative prompt, describe types of images that aren't photos. Anime, render, cartoon, etc. In the positive prompt, describe a detail that you would only find in a highly detailed image. Some people just write "highly detailed," but that does jack shit because no one's out there tagging photos as "highly detailed." Or they'll say "8k resolution," which works, but it's too limiting and it'll throw off the style too much. In this case, I included "sweaty skin." A photo that captures the texture of skin is going to be highly detailed, and those photos will become the AI's source material. This has the side effect of making the composition rather tightly framed, but that worked here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luckyboy@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 years ago nice one, the face looks very real, but then the reflection on her body gave it away (for me) permalink fedilink source
[–] HotBeef@feddit.uk 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) What tool are you using to make this? permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hey! See my comment here: https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/614070 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HotBeef@feddit.uk 1 point 3 years ago thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child) Hey! See my comment here: https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/614070 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HotBeef@feddit.uk 1 point 3 years ago thanks permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DeadWorld@lemm.ee -11 points 3 years ago (2 children) Looks good, but a little young? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArchTemperedKoala@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's the imperfections that shows age mostly.. So with AI there's no imperfections unless intended.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago I feel you, but maybe next step is adding those imperfections. Like i said, i like it. Its just a little jarring looking up the body only to see a much youger face put on it permalink fedilink source parent [–] ChipthensfwMonk@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Prompters need to add (21 years old:1.3) in the positive prompt and “child, childlike” in the negative prompt. They also need to judge better whether the content the AI produces is too young looking. If you make something and think “is that too young?” Just assume it is and regenerate with the above tips. 21 is a good starting point because AI doesn’t seem to be completely accurate with ages yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 14 points 3 years ago That's a good idea, actually, I'll start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArchTemperedKoala@lemmy.world 19 points 3 years ago (1 child) It's the imperfections that shows age mostly.. So with AI there's no imperfections unless intended.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago I feel you, but maybe next step is adding those imperfections. Like i said, i like it. Its just a little jarring looking up the body only to see a much youger face put on it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago I feel you, but maybe next step is adding those imperfections. Like i said, i like it. Its just a little jarring looking up the body only to see a much youger face put on it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChipthensfwMonk@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) Prompters need to add (21 years old:1.3) in the positive prompt and “child, childlike” in the negative prompt. They also need to judge better whether the content the AI produces is too young looking. If you make something and think “is that too young?” Just assume it is and regenerate with the above tips. 21 is a good starting point because AI doesn’t seem to be completely accurate with ages yet. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 14 points 3 years ago That's a good idea, actually, I'll start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlightsOfTheMind@lemmynsfw.com [S] 14 points 3 years ago That's a good idea, actually, I'll start doing that. permalink fedilink source parent
top 11 comments