The Type 01 is the first model to arrive from Jaguar’s rebirth. The British carmaker was an early entrant to the modern EV market with the 2017 I-Pace, which was fun to drive even if it was too small inside and perhaps completely unreliable. An all-electric sedan was supposed to be next, but a year from the showroom, it was abruptly canceled, leaving the automaker with nothing to sell as old models like the F-Pace ceased production.

“The jag, it looks like a car you’d steal in Cyberpunk 2077,” said one Ars staffer approvingly. Credit: Jaguar

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The car of the future was supposed to have pulsating LEDs, self-drive, pursuit mode, turbo boost and an reassuringly patronising personality that would scan for threats and tell you what you were doing wrong. I was supposed to have a chest and head of hair like David Hasselhoff and a rich crime-fighting sugar daddy to fund my escapades.

This is off-white nothingness inside. It leaves me cold.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

    They don't know what to do with the face. They're afraid to go big, so they go bland and call it "understated elegance." The only clue it's a Jaguar is if you happen to notice the name on the front. At least the Rolls still looks like a Rolls.

    Massive A-pillars. I guess if you can blow $150K on a car, you can afford to hit pedestrians.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 48 minutes ago

    A Pillars are perfectly capable of hiding whole ass cars, too.

    Turning out of my apartment's driveway and entering the roundabout are two places I am regularly almost creamed thanks to the safety provided by a hefty A Pillar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

    This car at least has a somewhat unique look to it unlike the Luce; which looks so powerfully generic that it almost doesn't matter what other features it has.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    I'm not even sure you can compare the two. To me the have different missions and are appealing to different segaments of (albeit the same) market. The only similarity is they're both EVs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

    It looks like it’s from Batman: The Animated Series which is cool.

    Until you realize something that long would be totally impractical.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 46 minutes ago*

    It's the basic shape of one of the Batmobiles, but without any of the details that made it interesting.

    Like pitching a movie based on the "Titanic" but the boat makes it to port safely--completely missing the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Do EV's have to be ugly? Are they doing this on purpose so you don't buy them? What's going on here?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    It feels like a low poly version of a muscle car.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago*

    That logo is awful; it looks like it spells "Joovar" from any sort of distance lol

    I happen to somewhat like the design, though, just doesn't look anything like a jag.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 hour ago* (5 children)

    Ugh, I thought we were getting over this already.

    The interior is fine, I can appreciate the clean lines and overall minimal ornamentation. White is probably a bad choice for a car that any real human is going to use.

    But a touchscreen for the interior controls? Really? Is it 2015 again? Physical buttons are better. I would even go so far as to say they're necessary for any controls that a driver might operate while driving - they should be findable by feel only, in the dark, while your eyes are on the road. A luxury vehicle design should certainly have physical controls, even if they're tucked behind one of these panels to preserve the look of the interior:

    It wouldn't be ideal, but it would be much better than that thing that looks like a phone bolted onto the center spine, which is just ugly. It sticks out from the rest of the interior design like a flashing neon sign of cost-cutting. It looks like a POS terminal, like I'm about to pay for my coffee:

    What a bad decision, or probably chain of bad decisions made through several committee meetings.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    Whoever came up with the concept of touchscreens being somehow more sophisticated and luxurious than buttons deserves to be fired. Actually, while you're at it, fire the guy that thought EVs needed all the useless tech gizmos cramped into them as standard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    If touchscreens were better then every plane would have them on every instrument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    They're cheaper to implement, and in this context it certainly looks the part. That panel looks like a Garmin circa 2008:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    Obviously they’re cheaper to implement. Wiring up all those buttons costs money and we’re not gonna waste money on good UX.

    Plus making everything electric means more warranty repairs when the electric motors break.

    But that’s enshittification for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    I remember the electric Ferrari - hideous.

    These companies mastered a design language and they've failed to maintain it in these EVs. You can take a chance with a radical new design, but don't be surprised if you fall on your face. Slapping jag or Ferrari on it doesn't make it look good.

    BMW is another major offender.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    High end electric cars will not matter until battery technology advances to the point where those cars can compete with internal combustion engines on a power to weight ratio.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    What are you talking about? EV's have been blowing doors on ICE cars on this metric for a while. A $44k MG 4 Xpower has a better power to weight ratio than a $122k Porsche 911, and beats it off the line by .3 seconds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 24 minutes ago

    What I really meant is the total weight of the car.

    EVs weight too much for anything other than drag racing. They are way to heavy for turning and even something simple like a speed bump feel like a violent pothole.

    We still don’t have an EV that can be as fun to drive as a Miata.

    CATL is said to be developing a 12,000 Wh/Kg battery which is about the same as gasoline. That would make a real EV supercar that would rival a Porsche 911 or a Ferrari.

  • source
  • parent