NEW YORK — Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani today directed the New York City Police Department (NYPD) to conduct a comprehensive review of its use-of-force policies and practices, the first such review in a decade. The review will take place over the coming months and include a robust community engagement process.

Mayor Mamdani also announced a package of reforms to strengthen accountability when police officers are accused of serious misconduct, including measures to facilitate the completion of the disciplinary process before an officer retires.

The reforms follow the retirement of one of the officers facing disciplinary charges for the tragic death of Win Rozario, a 19-year-old New Yorker who was shot and killed by NYPD officers during a mental health crisis in March 2024. That officer retired before a disciplinary trial could take place.

“When the government uses force against a New Yorker, the standard for accountability must be at its highest. Every New Yorker deserves to know that force will be used lawfully, carefully and only when necessary,” said Mayor Mamdani. “We have an obligation to Win’s family and to every New Yorker who calls for help in a moment of crisis. This review is about making sure our policies reflect that responsibility, that our officers have the guidance and training they need and that New Yorkers and their families can trust their city will treat them with care and dignity.”

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Remove qualified immunity and require police to buy their own independent liability insurance.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    Then nobody will want to be a police officer. If there's even a remote chance that a mistake in your career could destroy your family's well-being, the only people who will want to do the job will have no families and no money and probably not be the people you want as police officers.

    That said, I think there should be a clear standard that qualified immunity does not apply when the conduct of the officer is clearly outside of department policy. I don't mean like they didn't properly follow Rule 2134(b)12c, I mean major obvious violations of policy and civil rights that are plainly and obviously egregious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    Replace "police" with "doctors" and it's the same situation, similar risks (you could easily kill or maim somebody). That's what insurance is for. One time issue, your insurance covers you but your rates go up. More times and the rates will be insane or they won't cover you. Self limiting. And there are doctors still despite this risk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago

    Replace “police” with “doctors” and it’s the same situation, similar risks (you could easily kill or maim somebody). That’s what insurance is for. One time issue, your insurance covers you but your rates go up. More times and the rates will be insane or they won’t cover you. Self limiting. And there are doctors still despite this risk.

    Doctors get paid a lot more and thus can afford more insurance. And a patient chooses to see a doctor, most patients don't automatically want to sue their doctor. A suspect wants to sue the officer in the hope of getting their case thrown out or bringing into question the officer who arrested them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    how about this: bodycam on = immunity

    bodycam off? no more immunity and your personal insurance picks up the tab. win-win for everyone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

    I feel if this guy was legimate, something bad would have happened to him already.

    Hopefully I'm wrong and he is legitimate. I don't really trust America to not have fed placed politicians for long game objectives.

    Shit... The democracy isnt even legitimate for the most part.

    America is like a "Legal" Modern Mafia.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    He should have fired the police chief Jessica Tisch, but instead we get a "comprehensive review" and no concrete action so far.

    It could be something, but this is frequently used as a tactic so people move on and forget about an incident while the "review" is closed after a while in the background. Israel has shown how to abuse these "reviews" into their soldiers crimes to perfection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment