all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 22 minutes ago

This is realistic in that they divert power from anything before gravity generation.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    How did Picard get all the way over there?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

    Everyone knows you turn off your A/C in your car to get it to go faster!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    A bold maneuver but also wise

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 hours ago* (23 children)

    I never understood the "divert power from life support" trope of Star Trek.

    I mean, how much power could that possibly be?

    We essentially already sustained prolonged life support by using a tiny batch of primitive batteries and fuels cells during multi-day trips to reach the moon in the sixties.

    With efficient 23th century tech, life support should be almost self-sustaining using ambient waste heat or something.

    Always has been one of the major suspension-of-disbelief efforts for me...

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 43 minutes ago

    There is an episode where Voyager is looking for a fuel source because they are dangerously low.

    They cram all the staff into two decks and pull all life support from the other thirteen. It only gets them an hour of propulsion at one-quarter impulse thrust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 hours ago* (17 children)

    Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive and The Enterprise is a big ass ship. That's not even counting the other things life support does (like heat and CO2 scrubbing), just the air circulation.

    But even on the show, there's been a couple times where they mention the power from life support is nearly negligible. 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    Wouldn't gravity generation and inertial dampners be part of life support? Going max impulse after turning those off is likely to end up with a lot of raspberry jam coating the walls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago* (2 children)

    Inertial dampeners probably not; that just stops the ship when not giving any thust because there's nothing to slow the ship down in space once it has momentum. The fake gravity on board tho, may be part of it. Not sure how the gravity plating is supposed to work; but I would be willing to bet there is technical documentation about it somewhere. Unless they just, like... Constantly barrel roll to create "gravity" that way 🤔 (gravity in quotes as it would actually be centripital force).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

    Inertial dampers are how the crew can survive high-g maneuvers, they'd be pinned to the back wall and have their skulls crushed by their own faces if they suddenly went to full impulse or warp without them active.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    I'm pretty well convinced that gravity plating has to be negligible power draw or possibly even passive technology, since they've boarded centuries-old derelict ships that still have artificial gravity. Maybe the gravity plating contains some exotic space-warping material that generates a gravity field. That could also explain the times when someone becomes intangible and can walk through walls, but don't fall through the floor.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (9 children)

    Air-conditioning is pretty power intensive

    Even that should still be minuscle compared to getting rid of the waste heat from a huge antimatter reactor.
    Feels like trying to get your Ferrari faster by switching of the cockpit instrument illumination. Not even worth giving the command.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (8 children)

    How does transferring heat out of a ship work? On the one hand, it's really cold in space, but on the other, there's no substrate to absorb and transfer the heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Thermal Radiation, you send it somewhere else. It’s how the sun heats our planet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    Isn't thermal radiation kinda slow, though? It's basically air cooling, but without air or fans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    It is, yes. A large fraction (about a quarter?) of what looks like solar panels on the ISS are actually dedicated radiator panels. The solar panels are angled to face the sun, and the radiators are angled at 90 degrees from the sun, to face empty space.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (3 children)

    From a thermodynamical standpoint, the whole Enterprise is something of a mess.

    But, hey, if you already have a "Heisenberg-Compensator", also having a "Boltzmann-Compensator" is probably not that implausible... ;-)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    And you can always re-arrange the sensor arrays if you're ever really in a pinch, but it'll take some time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    It's just written in to add weight to a tense moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    It’s just written in to add weight to a tense moment.

    I know the reason why they did it.

    Still annoys me slightly. Actually even more than the techno-babble that is mentioned by most as a somewhat annoying thing written in.

    But I don't watch Star Trek for its scientific accuracy, so it's ok.

    As already said: It is still manageable by suspension of disbelief to enjoy the strong aspects of the show, which mostly are not the specifics of the science-based things being shown (in contrast to the underlying ideas - those are often great!)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    I realize now I should have answered the question differently. The life support uses power by a reverse band of takiyons to a flow emitter. This then spread across the ship via a neutrino wave to a tungsten pulse generator.

    That's why it uses so much power they have to divert it at times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 hours ago

    Data just looking back, unaffected.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    FTL moment.

    "I don't need oxygen, just enough power for the lasers... Oh."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 hours ago* (1 child)

    That bridge is huge it would take hours or days for them to suffocate, also, how power hungry is that life support system that often is enough to make a difference? Do they use replicators instead of fans?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    I assume since they are on a ship for several years that life support also handles bio waste, CO2 scrubbing, and anything else to keep the ship habitable. It would probably still be negligible but maybe rearranging molecules takes a fuckload of power, idk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    Yeah, but think how fast they'll be!

  • source