all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 44 minutes ago* (3 children)

My windows "start" menu takes at least a full minute to open. Then, when I select, say, Control Panel, it takes another full minute, totally blank with no options

I'm not a programmer or even smart, but isn't that absolute shite? I've used Commodores, Apple II, Macs, 386, 486, have used windows since first job (I don't remember my first Windows version, but it played Tetris in color. Three? haha 3)

Menus have always worked before.

My next laptop will be linux Mint because I like mint ice cream. Does it have menus that open? I am super excited.

I apologize but it made me really mad and now i feel better.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 29 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago) (1 child)

    Don't wait for the next laptop, just install Linux now.

    It sounds like your laptop is completely unusable anyway, and you can dual boot while you're figuring out if everything works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 minutes ago

    I have a laptop from work that runs Windows 11 and have the same experience with the unusable start menu. I wasn't allowed to install Linux on the machine. I run Linux on every other machine I have and have used Linux since the 90s.

    However after complaining and begging with IT I was allowed to try running Linux on it. It's a managed machine, so I had to do a dual boot from a second drive IT installed for me. If it worked out and IT was happy, I could run Linux.

    Unfortunately it was a total failure. The big issue is the CPU is AMD and has on-board graphics that are normally used for everything. However there is also a Nvidia GPU, I think an RTX Pro, which is used for acceleration stuff. In Windows this works well enough, the AMD handles most of the regular display stuff and is plenty powerful for that. The Nvidia gets used to offload certain workloads, to make sure the laptop is usable for certain kinds of software. On Linux this is a configuration that simply isn't supported or working at all. Either it just won't boot or do graphics at all or it's extremely slow and/or unstable or with some effort the Nvidia chip can be completely disabled and just the AMD is used. Basically turning a $2500 laptop into a $1000 one and unable to run certain workloads. Now getting some of that software to run would be hard anyways, as it's not typical software and only supported on certain versions of Windows. But I hadn't even gotten to that stage.

    The whole experience reminded me of getting Linux to run on my laptop back in 2002. An unstable mess with half the features missing. Back then I loved the challenge and when I finally got the thing to ping over the PCMCIA wifi card I was super happy. Never did get the sound working on that laptop tho.

    Obviously I aborted the experiment and have just accepted Windows 11. It's fucking awful and I bitch about it every time I need to use that machine. But for now, there doesn't seem to be a better option.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 53 minutes ago

    So many managers

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 hour ago

    They're all just idiots, amazing

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 15 minutes ago

    The silver lining was that Bill never had to experience movie maker. That would've been a whole extra email.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 16 minutes ago

    Win 98 was the last good one. Easy network setup, no spaghetti settings.

    And he's correct; installing and removing software via the software tab was comfortable and polluting it with random sub packages is killing its use.

    But this shows, there was no canonical way to publish software. A manager oversight from bill himself at the time probably.

    Plus this makes me wonder if he was using a different system normally or was not a power user.

    Also lol bro owning means you pass the issue to your team and rake in the promotion when they fixed it.

  • source