Archive link: https://archive.ph/U1zEK

all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 49 minutes ago

"So, how do you make your money?" "I lie".

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago

    They can’t go public.

    I bet they end up merging or being bought long before they’re actually ready to go public.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 hours ago* (1 child)

    More likely its because they need more time to cook their books.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 4 hours ago

    Just another scam, move along

  • source
  • [–] 57 points 5 hours ago (9 children)

    It's got nothing to do with safety, he doesn't have the numbers to go public and is trying to mask that.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    My $0.02 is that Dario genuinely believes* this, Sam doesn't, but it's convenient for OpenAI to hitch its wagon to Anthropic's call for regulation because their financials are a mess.

    • just because his belief is genuine doesn't mean it's reasonable. I find the whole thing kind of laughable actually.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

    What kind of numbers do they need?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    For the evaluation OpenAI and its investors would target, they would need pretty great ones. But another thing is that they'd also need to look good relative to anthropic, who is also looking at an IPO.

    Not sure if their plan for it has changed,but OpenAI would always be measured against them. And my understanding is that anthropic is said to have better financials while having raised less investment money so far.

    There is only so much liquidity for IPOs and SpaceX already vacuumed up a lot. If both openai and and anthropic would IPO as an option for investors to buy into a pure play, I assume everyone would compare the two and go for the perceived winner (or want a good discount for the second best)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    This is what we get for Musk keeping Trump balls warm. Probably the same reason we see Tesla back with the majority of US EV sales. Fuckin racket. If the spacex and grok deal wasnt a thing the other players might have a chance to have some skin in the IPO game. Yes, yes, why sympathize for these corporate monsters, I heard you already. Just raving about politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Because they're generating money with zero expectation of ever making any. Getting more customers only costs them more...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    what i heard was that ai companies now push for regulation to legitimize themselves in front of the law. that saves ai companies from the state being like "yea the party's up we stop this and crack down on it"

    same happened to bitcoin.

    but idk shit :)

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 hours ago

    Hahaha, AI hype has already reached and past its peak, the best time to do an ipo for them is today, second best time would be tomorrow.

    Sure it might be here to stay, but the gold rush FOMO phase is over.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago*
    [–] 160 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

    Don’t worry, it’s DEFINITELY not because they would need to disclose their finances to investors. Just keep pouring money in and everything will turn out fine!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

    Anyone who has gone through an IPO knows how fucking rigorous all of the audits and reporting are for investors. Guaranteed 1000% that they failed the audit, or worse they didn't even get to the audit stage, or as you said their finances they know are shit. It is zero surprise to me that they're waiting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

    Where was this rigorous audit for SpaceX?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 9 hours ago* (6 children)

    Its result was and is aggregated by some freaks here

    https://spacexchart.com/about

    Their own numbers are documented here:

    https://ir.spacex.com/investors/default.aspx

    Including all their bullshit Musk-AI spendings. I have no idea why anyone thought this to be a good investment or a good company - they did do that audit and published the results, people still flocked (...) to it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

    I mean I hate Musk as much as the next Musk hater, but I can understand why SpaceX IPO'd and why OpenAI would hide their audit and finances.

    SpaceX literally made self-landing rockets. They're not a Tesla or a Boring Company bullshit scam. They did something that was amazing, and still is, and opened the door to much cheaper launches into orbit, meaning they can get so many government contracts for anything they need to do in space.

    It is WAY cheaper to put stuff in orbit now thanks to SpaceX. That's why they also went for low earth orbit internet and did starlink. Their own tech made starlink possible. Now I'd never use starlink because fuck Musk, but this is a direct result of SpaceX doing groundbreaking work.

    Literally everything Musk does rides on the popularity of SpaceX actually making a massive achievement in rocketry. Tesla fucking sucks and doesn't even make the best self driving electric vehicles. The Boring company was a failure and/or scam. Starlink is a fucked up attempt to get everyone's data... Which would be a cooler idea if it weren't related to Musk but I need to have a tiny bit of trust in my ISP, sorry.

    Only SpaceX ever did something cool, and it was legitimately really cool, and the result of good engineers doing work that Musk took the credit for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago

    But the way I understand is SpaceX wasn't going into the IPO as a rocket company, they were going as an AI company. Their value was absurdly inflated because it was not based on their current space launch business or even on Starlink, but on possible future revenue (datacenters in space, you see) from the AI side of the company, which came from the xAI merge just earlier this year. Even if the company itself is solid, their stocks were still a scam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 38 minutes ago

    The falcon 9 absolutely did cut the balls off of cost to orbit. Once they cleared the backlog of launches that had built up due to the cost and slow turnaround they had nothing to launch. Starlink is their main customer and without them the Falcon 9 architecture doesn't have the cadence required to be profitable. Starship is the new solution in need of a problem, so what's the problem? Data centers in space! I think they're right up against the rocket equation with starship and they're counting on trimming the fat to make it work. We'll see which dies first, physics or finances.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    Oh SpaceX core business including their numbers are amazing, I agree! But they also disclosed the whole AI stuff, including the madness of "inference in space" - the physics is then only one search away. .. PayPal was really cool and solved problems as well - and so did Tesla!

    I think Musk is like a reverse Midas, eversthing he touches becomes shit for everyone else :/

    SpaceX was by far the biggest exciting development in the last years for me ... There's still hope I'll be wrong though - hoping for it!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Plus it's Musk's branding. Unfortunately people still buy into that guys brand. OpenAI doesn't really have that kind of moat. just look at Samsung and Sk Hynix. Open AI and anthropic would have similar, if not worse fate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago

    It's a good point. He might have ruined his "brand" in some ways, but he always kept some people believing he's some sort of super genius, the kind of people that think intelligence is directly proportional to your net worth.

    He does some super cringe shit trying to pretend he's a genius online and most don't fall for it, but as long as some wealthy people do, he'll continue to have his brand.

    Also his stocks have made some people rich, are usually way overvalued, so even people that hate the fuck usually know not to bet against his stocks. He is pretty good at blatantly manipulating the fuck out of the market no matter what the news cycle is, and he never suffers consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    Hilarious.. I guess this pushes back the inevitable bubble collapse (probably until just after they do go public)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    They will never go public. Their finances will be in an even poorer state next year, because that is when the first of their many billion dollar loans are coming due.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    I am willing to bet the loans get differed, they are later forced to IPO and will pay debts with that whilst Altmam probably noshes off the great orange turd in hopes he can disappear somewhere with a truck load of cash.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 10 hours ago

    I hope they go right under a rock and stay there.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    Good news for retail investors.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Is this a concession of defeat to spaceX

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    I am waiting to see how and when anthropic IPOs, because I think that is l the more important comparison. OpenAI is caught between a rock and a hard place, because they want to go public for exit liquidity, but anthropic will always be a direct comparison. And if the financials aren't in their favor, then they won't get the valuation they desire as the second best.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 5 hours ago

    He is suggesting we slow everything down until he works out how the Chinese are Chinesing.

  • source