They added a "feature" where to improve the loading time of the start menu (which is already a fucked up thing to need to say) they briefly lift power limits from the cpu when you press start
post
Its only the recommended section thats written in react.
We got plenty of real things to clown on Microsoft with. We dont need to make shit up. This is just rage bait.
Ah gotcha. So it's not strictly correct to call the whole start menu a react application, just a part of it that always loads when you press the start button.
I'm all for being correct, but MS absolutely deserves being clowned on for this.
So let's clown on them for the 10% spike, let's not say that its because its 100% react when its not.
In the end, every time you use your start menu you have to load the react crap. At that point, they could have done the whole thing in react with the same ramifications. I am all for correctness, but in real life use the start menu is visibly not working as it should, regardless of the element that is actually causing the issue here.
To the user and in function, there's very little difference between "It's React" and "It loads a React submodule every time you use it." The result is the same. Your first response is fair and informational. This one is pedantic.
That's actually worse. You do get how that's actually worse, right?
Yes, a hodgepodge of shit is of course worse. But fucken say that then. Dont say, "its literally a react native application! Thats why its so bad!" when that is not true and sounds ignorant.
Personally, I am 100% grateful for this correction, because I didn’t know and since I’ve heard the less accurate ragebait version dozens of times at this point I would have been confused, next time I have to spin up a Win11 image, why I couldn’t replicate the spike I’ve heard so much about. The fact that it’s tied to a particular UI component, one of many that machine provisioning scripts and playbooks commonly disable, means it would have remained a bothersome unresolved mystery to me forever if not for your comment. So thanks.
I try not to let such considerations get in the way of posting excellent ragebait.
I'm a React developer too and I went tf off on the project manager who suggested we replace the company's perfectly fine Wordpress homepage with a self-built page running on React. Actually, never ever use React for anything that matters. It's exclusively suited for making janky browser games and B2B applications.
We had a Svelte application. We chose svelte because it's simpler than React is, and it's much faster. However further down the line a consultant said to the CTO that we should move to React. I said React is more complicated and has more edge cases, and its slower, but the consultant said more people know react and it has a bigger community, so we switched to React. This was fairly early in the project. React has sooo many edge cases. It's not made with async in mind, if you forget to add a [] to a useEffect it just breaks your application completely instead of doing the more sensible thing, it says "don't use useEffect" but there's so many "except when" that you end up using it everywhere regardless. Later on the CTO got all in on Claude Code, so we spent the easter holidays rewriting the app in Svelte. Except a few bugs it was feature complete by that week and in production a few days later.
It's much, MUCH faster now, and the code is much simpler. We lost absolutely nothing by moving back to Svelte but gained a lot.
Edit: not that using either of these is sane thing to do in the start menu. The start menu should not be a web application.
What's a B2B application? Backend To Backend?
Butt 2 Butt
Business to Business
Bozo 2 Bozo
TL;DR: Microsoft devs are mac users.
Ironically Apple would never allow a first party app to be anything other than Swift. No React allowed.
Some parts of Music preferences are in fact, react: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2022/inspecting-web-views-in-macos/
Is this for real? The guy that coded windows start menu doesn't consider performance to be relevant to good software?
Also what is react native? Is it the js library adapted to the windows desktop API?
The twitter thread is a fabrication.
The react native shit? all true. True enough that MS made an announcement talking about how they had removed it even. https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/03/21/microsoft-confirms-windows-11-start-menu-performance-boost-shift-to-winui-from-web-based-components/
As far as I can tell, react native is a way to make easy cross-compatible gui components in javascript. One of the more stupid things ms has done lately.
that's fake... right? Please?
Clearly a guy pretending to be the developer 🤣
Yeah but that applies to most of MS's engineering staff.
While working for a CDN I learned that every press of the Windows 10 Start button involved at least one call to at least one remote hostname to fetch data about the local weather to be shown in the Start menu. I presume machines were caching the response for a while, but realizing that this host was getting poked (and who knows how many others) every time someone clicked that button continues to blow my mind.
PS: 🤘

J'en reviens pas que c'est un québécois qui a implémenté le menu démarrer de Windows 11.
J'haïs le nouveau menu.
Si j'le voué m'en va y donner un char de marde.
Omelette du frommage
If I could go back in time but only have the power to change something really inconsequential, I'd go to whenever this episode of Dexter's Laboratory was written and force the writers to correct it to "omelette au fromage".
This is absolutely my dumbest pet peeve. Instead of cheese omelet, "omelette du fromage" reads as "omelet from cheese".
un char de marde
Is that 8 bits of marde?
That doesn’t sound like a lot of marde, but probably more marde than I would like to receive on any given day.
Be grateful its not written with straight up react wrapped in electron
It saddens me that it isn't. That would be a lot funnier. Well, as long as you aren't forced to use it in your life. I use Arch btw
top 50 comments