all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 2 hours ago

Unfortunately, the average idiot will accept this without question and the rest of us will be left out to dry.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    This initiative is just a smokescreen; it actually pushes things down the slippery slope.

    Citizens must not be forced to identify themselves to access lawful online content or services unless strictly necessary, proportionate and provided by law. The legislation should require anonymous or pseudonymous proof-of-age, data minimisation, selective disclosure

    Define "necessary". Define "by law". The pushers for proof-of-age already say it's anonymous – but it can't be.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments