all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Nah. Maybe after they implode we can pick up the good parts but we definitely don't need the whole thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Yah, don't need much of the south. But maybe we can accept one northern state :) But only one, we def couldn't handle more then that if we're going to treat them like a full province.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    you kind folks don't want this.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    We need 3 more provinces for this to make any sense.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I don't think that will work out. Slavery is totally illegal in Canada while it is still allowed as punishment for a crime in the US. Texas has declared itself independent twice to maintain the institution of slavery, they'd definitely do it a third time for all that prison labor money.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Does south Canada get free healthcare?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    That's like asking your oncologist if you can keep the bits they removed.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I for one, welcome our new Canadian overlords.

  • source