▲ 20 ▼ AirJet makes a MacBook Air perform like a MacBook Pro (www.macworld.com) submitted 2 years ago by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/hardware@lemmy.ml 5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (3 children) Been keeping an eye on that tech for a while. Looks very interesting for laptops and graphics cards. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Efficiency doesn't seem too good, though. Last time I heard about them, it was something like 5W power to remove 20W of heat. Fans and heatsinks are probably more efficient than that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's an efficiency factor of 4 right there. The design is likely limited by the surface area. If they manage to squeeze a heatsink in that will increase the capacity for heat removal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago No, that's the thing, this concept supposedly doesn't need a heatsink. It only works if it's flat like that and just putting two of them side by side won't increase efficiency either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children) Efficiency doesn't seem too good, though. Last time I heard about them, it was something like 5W power to remove 20W of heat. Fans and heatsinks are probably more efficient than that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's an efficiency factor of 4 right there. The design is likely limited by the surface area. If they manage to squeeze a heatsink in that will increase the capacity for heat removal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago No, that's the thing, this concept supposedly doesn't need a heatsink. It only works if it's flat like that and just putting two of them side by side won't increase efficiency either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) That's an efficiency factor of 4 right there. The design is likely limited by the surface area. If they manage to squeeze a heatsink in that will increase the capacity for heat removal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago No, that's the thing, this concept supposedly doesn't need a heatsink. It only works if it's flat like that and just putting two of them side by side won't increase efficiency either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 point 2 years ago No, that's the thing, this concept supposedly doesn't need a heatsink. It only works if it's flat like that and just putting two of them side by side won't increase efficiency either. permalink fedilink source parent
all 5 comments