all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I’m desperately trying to find a school that eschews all technology until at least year 7 for my son. The kids raised on ipads are completely cooked and I don’t want that.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    All technology ? I'd say having dedicated computer classes could be useful ; although I'm not familiar with how old "year 7" is (unless you litterally mean 7 years old ?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    All. Studies consistently show students perform worse when they’ve been made reliant on technology.

    The age would be 12-13 for year 7.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I think "reliant" is the key word though.

    In Collège (11-14 years old) we had a "Technologie" class where we learnt how to do various things on computers, from presentations to basic 3D modelling ; all using free software.

    I genuinely think that class was helpful, and we had no computers during any other class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Assuming they're angloid, their year numbers are american grade+1. So year 7 is sixth grade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Nothing new, wherever there's nepo admissions there's incompetent students.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Nobody will give you the education you need to overthrow them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DviCUygm3eM

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    been saying it for years. the youth of "tomorrow" was never challenged.

    you can't learn without pain. we evolved through pain, suffering, and struggle. what makes us think that allowing kids to be comfortable and docile makes them better equipped for the future.

    ohh wait! because the rich kids need an army of enslaved fools.

    you think the kids at private schools for the wealthy and powerful are comforted and accepted?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You often can’t learn without motivation. That motivation does not need to painful, and the problem I have with the idea that it does is that people often think the pain is the point.

    People aren’t stupid because they’re comfortable, they’re stupid because many are actively discouraged from exploring new ideas. Their curiosity is crushed so that the politicians and people writing the curriculums don’t need to think too hard. I’m all for the notion that solving something a particular way has merit in a learning environment but the way we handle those lessons is so embarrassing.

    It’s not “yes that’s also a good way to do it, but I would like to see it done this way for this exercise” it’s simply “you’re wrong”. Kids can see that they got the right answer and don’t understand why the authority figure is clearly lying to them so they simply lose respect for them, along with the motivation to try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment