▲ 326 ▼ Mozilla warns UK: Breaking VPNs will not magically fix Britain's age-check mess (www.theregister.com) submitted 4 months ago by QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 78 points 4 months ago (16 children) Anything but parenting properly. permalink fedilink source hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] brillotti@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (12 children) These laws are not made to protect kids, but to amass power over the people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 24 points 4 months ago* (5 children) I wouldn’t be surprised if banning VPNs was the real goal of the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 4 months ago* (2 children) The whole goal is to track every single person's activity on the internet and VPNs get in the way, so that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Go offgrid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Totalitarian regime speedrun permalink fedilink source parent [–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago That is impossible without a China-level snooping apparatus. And even then it’s only partly possible. This is law made by dumb people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 19 points 4 months ago (1 child) Which is weird because I'm obligated to collect data from UK visitors, but not obligated to share it back with the UK government. This means UK government has essentially mandated that every country collects data on UK citizens. Something opposite of what EU and others do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago Don’t worry, when they think they’ll need it you’ll get a polite but abrupt phone call permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (3 children) Just a coincidence world governments all became concerned about kids on the same day 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) There isn't enough terrorism to justify things with that, so children it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments. But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 25 points 4 months ago Problem is its not actually about the children. As always they're the excuse. The UK Government will stoop to almost any excuse possible to give itself more surveillance powers - it took 1984 as a goal rather than a warning. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago Or teaching parents how to parent properly, or cracking down on addictive social media algorithms, or researching the ill affects of pornography, or providing counseling to teens and adults harmed by dangerous materials. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago One of the porn sites I visit has a pop up when the home page first loads that says If you have children, implement parental controls. And a link to a guide for how to do that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago (12 children) These laws are not made to protect kids, but to amass power over the people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 24 points 4 months ago* (5 children) I wouldn’t be surprised if banning VPNs was the real goal of the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 4 months ago* (2 children) The whole goal is to track every single person's activity on the internet and VPNs get in the way, so that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Go offgrid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Totalitarian regime speedrun permalink fedilink source parent [–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago That is impossible without a China-level snooping apparatus. And even then it’s only partly possible. This is law made by dumb people. permalink fedilink source parent [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 19 points 4 months ago (1 child) Which is weird because I'm obligated to collect data from UK visitors, but not obligated to share it back with the UK government. This means UK government has essentially mandated that every country collects data on UK citizens. Something opposite of what EU and others do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago Don’t worry, when they think they’ll need it you’ll get a polite but abrupt phone call permalink fedilink source parent [–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (3 children) Just a coincidence world governments all became concerned about kids on the same day 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) There isn't enough terrorism to justify things with that, so children it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments. But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 24 points 4 months ago* (5 children) I wouldn’t be surprised if banning VPNs was the real goal of the law. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 4 months ago* (2 children) The whole goal is to track every single person's activity on the internet and VPNs get in the way, so that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Go offgrid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Totalitarian regime speedrun permalink fedilink source parent [–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago That is impossible without a China-level snooping apparatus. And even then it’s only partly possible. This is law made by dumb people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 4 months ago* (2 children) The whole goal is to track every single person's activity on the internet and VPNs get in the way, so that too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Go offgrid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] newton@feddit.online 1 point 4 months ago (1 child) Go offgrid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 4 months ago I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Totalitarian regime speedrun permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago That is impossible without a China-level snooping apparatus. And even then it’s only partly possible. This is law made by dumb people. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 19 points 4 months ago (1 child) Which is weird because I'm obligated to collect data from UK visitors, but not obligated to share it back with the UK government. This means UK government has essentially mandated that every country collects data on UK citizens. Something opposite of what EU and others do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago Don’t worry, when they think they’ll need it you’ll get a polite but abrupt phone call permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago Don’t worry, when they think they’ll need it you’ll get a polite but abrupt phone call permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (3 children) Just a coincidence world governments all became concerned about kids on the same day 😅 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) There isn't enough terrorism to justify things with that, so children it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments. But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 months ago (2 children) There isn't enough terrorism to justify things with that, so children it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments. But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 child) We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments. But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 25 points 4 months ago Problem is its not actually about the children. As always they're the excuse. The UK Government will stoop to almost any excuse possible to give itself more surveillance powers - it took 1984 as a goal rather than a warning. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago Or teaching parents how to parent properly, or cracking down on addictive social media algorithms, or researching the ill affects of pornography, or providing counseling to teens and adults harmed by dangerous materials. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago One of the porn sites I visit has a pop up when the home page first loads that says If you have children, implement parental controls. And a link to a guide for how to do that. permalink fedilink source parent
all 17 comments