Thanks, comrade.

One could ask if bourgoisie electoralism were to become sophisticated enough to allow for pressure valve for discontent (let’s say including against the genocides and the jingoisim against Russia, China, Iran and Venuzeula) for even budding marxists what would that look like and how does the PSL differentiate themselves from that?

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/11468794/8142738

The facetious response? The angry parade party. As others have said when you repeatedly issue demands and they do not comply to your demands, and then nothing happens, then your teaching everyone your organisation can be safely ignored. Even some radlibs understand this. The PSL has the audacity to not only do this but also call themselves MLs. Like what is the strategy for leverage here beyond electoralism because like a very basic tenet of understanding the political economy is you cannot play by the rules of the class you are hoping to overthrow and then win?

I have other glaring issues with them but the problem is the average westerner, despite any hardship and whatever leftist aesthetic they don, absolutely refuse to learn from those who won. Like right now could one point to a serious PSL strategy where they outline the pitfalls of bourgoisie electoralism, how they going to overcome this, and what scientific analysis they have done so they can focus on populations with the most revolutionary potential? I could keep going and on but I am just going to leave it there. This ain't about some nonsense about purity. I am saying the leadership is a bunch of pseudoscientifc clowns.

All the original BLM leaders were killed off with the quickness but the PSL still stands because they are not a threat, but useful idiots where the state can go "look at these feckless commies". That's the most charitable explanation that they're liberal career oppurtunities. But when you have folks trained from the George Washington University with openly genocidal polices on platforms they promote then this is way more than just ignorance at play here.

People cry wrecker because they haven't been to a third world country where organisations with way less privilege and wealth, in way harsher environments, have done way more, ML or not.

(Rant not directed at you. Please feel to swap any "you's" to a less affrontive pronoun)

Analysis would be nice.

Apparently Deng bad, US Green party good enough