I've been called a liberal and I've been called a tankie and I've been called an anarkiddie, but it's the first time someone calls me neo-nazi. I'm apparently all political positions at the same time.
post
Dbzwro is anti imperialist, ridiculous to call it neo nazi
Can you answer the question with Yes or No? If so, then it's not an open-ended question.
That's a stupid description. "Would you pull the lever if X is tied to trolley track a and y is tied to trolley track b?" is one of the most famous thought provoking questions, and it can be answered with a yes or no. Your definition is totally wrong and just ad hoc to dismiss this question. It is not the reality.
Notably, this is not part of the community's rules. If this were a reasonable definition, it would be. Good luck trying to enforce it.
"A Fediverse community for open-ended thought provoking questions"
(my emphasis)
It's literally the first sentence on the side bar for that community.
"An open-ended question is a questionthat cannot be answered with a "yes" or "no" response, or with a static response. Open-ended questions are phrased as a statement which requires a longer answer."
Looking at the community, the rule is not enforced. There are other not open-ended questions up and doing fine. At best, assuming this is intended to be enforced, it's being enforced selectively.
Assuming you're being perfectly honest and fair, this rule should be changed. Questions that require elaboration from "yes/no" should be (and are seemingly) allowed. Sure, questions that can only be answered with a "yes/no" aren't providing a discussion. The trolley problem, for example, can be answered with a yes or no, but invites people to expand on why.
Inb4 someone says you're a Zionist.
Why? What are they saying that would cause that?
Edit: wow that modlog, Jesus. https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/modlog?userId=9312352
Only 3 bans in there, and I think one of them was lifted. Most of the removed comments were sarcastic.
"Haha no I'm just ironic in my hate speech guys"
Let's take "The Jews are behind everything!"
That was my response to this comment:
There is no civil war. They is israeli backed gangs fighting Hamas
I was mocking what the other guy was saying (in my opinion). I was putting words in his mouth. I thought his trying to blame Israel was ludicrous and was probably driven by anti-Semitism under the guise of "I only hate Zionists." We're talking a lot about that today because it might turn out that some of the people doing that are neo-Nazis.
It's kind of like you just tried to put words in my mouth to mock what I wrote.
The mod considered it might be sarcasm but decided against it. That's fine. You can't win them all.
YDI.
Would have been better to post in an out of the loop community, because it definitely reads like shit-stirring. Especially "neo-nazi" admins of dbzer0. Like holy shit that's so far off the mark I have trouble taking it in good faith.
Anyway, I don't have context about the world admin being a zionist or not. But this comment lays out the rest of the events pretty clearly.
In short: an anarchist.nexus (piefed sister site to dbzer0 being on lemmy) admin set their display name to something intentionally shit stirring like "death to all zionists". A lemmy.world admin took it personally for some reason, and instead of reaching out to other admins on anarchist.nexus or dbzer0, reporting it, publicly announcing what was going on, or even running it by the other lemmy.world admins first, they just decided on their own to defederate from anarchist.nexus entirely.
As soon as dbzer0/anarchist.nexus admins learned what was going on, the admin with the shit stirring display name stepped down. Lemmy.world has refederated with anarchist.nexus, but the admin that took it personally is still holding onto the threat of defederating from them again.
dbzer0 is currently gathering allies from smaller lemmy and piefed instances to agree to collectively defed from lemmy.world if they follow through on defederating anarchist.nexus again, because this should have been something discussed, not done in the dark at the whim of a single person.
Well, I'm certainly not a neo-nazi, and the folks I talk to regularly here at the div0 and a.n chats seem pretty strongly against nazi-esque ideas. Our basic ethos, anarchy, is about no absolute power. Fascism is an incompatible idea and something I'm pretty sure we're all in agreement can fuck right off.
I completely agree that admins, myself and my cohorts inclusive, should be held to task by our users. I run a.n as a service to my users, and want the site to thrive as a community. A core agreement I have with my other admins and my users is that if situation comes where I am voted out as admin, I step back and genuinely work to hand over my access and servers to the chosen team. No ragequitting or tantrums.
This all started over some animosity and rash actions taken without any communication with the primary admin of a.n (me). A very vocal user, and admin at the time (stepped down since) said some things that upset the .world admin in question.
There's several threads covering this with receipts.
This is a good summary so far.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/25750862
I hope you can find a good answer in these details.
Look, ignoring anything else, people really need to get the idea that a post removal is not inherently power tripping. It's the point of a mod. That's the thing they're for: curating and keeping the crazies to a bare minimum.
If the mod is removing a single comment or post, with no other action, it isn't power tripping unless there's some corroboration of a pattern of suppression.
In this case, you provided no evidence of such, and the accusation you made is so far over the top absurd that I think you actually deserve a ban here.
Now, me and db0 have disagreed on multiple occasions, and I called them an asshole the other day, so this isn't someone kissing ass. But one thing that cannot be said about db0 is that they're in any way a fucking nazi. Fuck, if a real revolution popped off, despite my disagreements on precise details of what should happen after, db0 is one of a small handful of people on lemmy I'd gladly work beside.
This post is pure shit stirring, and isn't what this community is for, though it's good that it stayed up so that the absurdity of it can be addressed.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with the principle that mods and admins can be and should be called out when they're up to fuckery. But that isn't what this is. This, to go old school, is calumny, verging on libel.
Hey look, OP has previously defended Proton for being an explicitly pro-Trump/Nazi company.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/59927938/23253473 https://web.archive.org/web/20260428010818/https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/59927938/23253473

Link given in screenshot: https://tildes.net/~society/1ldg/proton_ceo_tweets_support_for_donald_trumps_department_of_justice_pick_and_the_us_republican_party
YDI
needs context
An admin on world is making waves by saying that calling for the murder of zionists is against its instance's ToS and the tankie triad instances (including triad-adjacence instances like dbzer0) are losing their shit over it.
It's quite amusing.
Correction, an admin on .world is pretending “murder all Zionists” was a direct death threat against them, after they got upset over their parent organisation being called ZioNazi.
The admin hastily acted to defederate an entire instance rather than reach out and talk to anyone. Leading to a days later announcement post by .world with 500+ replies mostly saying how shit .worlds admins acted by members of all instances.
.world meekly walked back the defederation, gave a random mod secret admin access and started banning users en masse.
Note how SMCF didn't actually read any of this, just angry at people being anti-genocide.
An admin on world is making waves by saying that calling for the murder of zionists is against its instance's ToS and the tankie triad instances (including triad-adjacence instances like dbzer0) are losing their shit over it.
No he's claiming a former admin saying kill all zionists is a threat to himself (Mr Kaplan) then banning instance AN because it was small, then threatening db0 afterwards.
I just realized that by unilaterally defederating an instance using its few numbers as a reason, Kaplan placed themselves as someone who would censor minorities due to their lower numbers, relatively speaking.
Having someone in power subconsciously saying the voices of the few don't matter is a bit ironic considering what the federation of these small instances is supposed to represent.
But I might be overreaching with this...
Gross attitude.
Where was the removed post posted to?
top 50 comments