418
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Donald Trump entered his war of choice against Iran without consulting global allies, but as he weighs an exit from the conflict, he is making it clear that he is expecting the world to help him fix the unintended damage that it has caused.

Trump is taking an increasingly annoyed tone toward Europe’s lack of support for the U.S.-Israeli war effort. He also is giving short shrift to the fact that his decision contributed to disrupting the flow of oil to global markets through the crucial Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has managed to largely choke off even as Trump insists that Iran has been “decimated.”

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] irate944@piefed.social 113 points 3 days ago

Now why would he need help with a war that he won 11 times already?

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago

He's senile as shit. He probably both wins and loses the war every day.

[-] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Sounds more like a fascist to me. "The enemy is both strong and weak".

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Frankly I'm loving the new oil prices. They're a great economical incentive to go renewable instead.

[-] Humanius@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

While high oil prices are a great incentive to go with renewables instead, a sudden spike in oil prices like we have seen over the past few weeks does not really give people time to respond. Instead they just have to accept paying for higher prices for everything (give it a few months before the high price of oil and energy will have trickled down to virtually everything you buy)

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 29 points 3 days ago

Sure, but the same happened in the 70s. Europes' response was to demand much better fuel economy from cars, and insulating homes much more to save on heating. If this is drawn out long enough we'll likely see a similar response with people moving to electric vehicles and dropping gas an oil for heating.

[-] davitz@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

IIRC that same crisis also spurred funding for some of the key initial research that eventually culminated in lithium ion batteries. Considering the various stops and starts in that timeline, battery tech could easily be a decade or two behind where it currently is if not for the oil crisis.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 3 days ago

This is a fair analysis, but remember: Europe today is much, much less competent than in the 70s. Folks like Starmer and Merz don't strike me like the "every crisis is an opportunity" type.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

They've already had about six years to respond since the supply chain disruptions during covid, not to mention decades of warnings by climate scientists before that.

Society chose to be short-sighted. It doesn't get to cry "We don't have time to respond to such a sudden and totally unpredictable spike in oil prices!"

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago

If he announces Iran has been decimated an eleventh time, then we’ll know he’s lying.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 days ago

Iran seem to have LOST the propaganda war...in the United States.

The rest of the world knows what's really going on.

America...so far behind it thinks it's ahead.

World War Greed

[-] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Iran seem to have LOST the propaganda war...in the United States.

Say what?

Anecdotally, go look at the YouTube comments for any video related to Iran, their 80% against it.

Even on local news videos, where everyone generally supports the death penalty for petty theft or aggravated liberalism.

Even if those are bots, they're still proof positive that the propaganda war has not been won by the pro-war factions.

And when it was actually polled, 60% of Americans opposed the war on its first week and wars don't get more popular over time.

MAGA and the GOP broadly support it, which is about 1/3 or the country, but that's a lost cause.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

1/3 of this country would like to kill 1/3 of this country while 1/3 watches.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Lost according to who? Everyone I’ve talked to here in the US knows that America is getting its ass kicked and they’re all pointing to trumps TACO train.

[-] elBedrock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Everyone I've talked to This is a thing called confirmation bias. It is highly likely that you surround yourself with people who have a mindset similar to you. Of course they will agree with your standpoint.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

"Everyone I’ve talked to"

The propaganda is on TV. Faux Nooz and such.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Oh it’s been long known that MSM is nothing more than a government mouthpiece at this time, and luckily most people I personally know, know that and know better. You’ll always get people who fall for the propaganda

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, you and I know that.

I stopped going to the local gym BECAUSE they have Fox on the TV WITH the sound up. I get these buffed out dudes stomping back and forth in front of the TV getting madder and madder. I don't even dare trying to talk to them. Their brain is "clean".

[-] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Well actually, 1 • 0.9^11 = ~0.314, so at that point about 31% of Iran would still remain.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, (if I’m following you) if you decimate what’s left each time. But if you decimate one part of the original each time, you only got ten times until there’s nothing left to decimate.

[-] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 6 points 3 days ago

I’m just joking, but yes.

There’s an old riddle that asks “if there is a door 8 feet away and you step half way towards the door each time, how many steps does it take to reach the door?” Same idea 🙂.

Tap for spoilerYou never reach the door.

Zeno's dichotomy paradox

[-] atropa@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

You dont say

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Narcissist’s Prayer:

“That didn’t happen.”

“And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.”

“And if it was, that’s not a big deal.”

“And if it is, that’s not my fault.”

“And if it was, I didn’t mean it.”

“And if I did, you deserved it.”

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 40 points 3 days ago

Trump literally said yesterday though that the Strait of Hormuz isn't necessary to secure, so why would we need Europe to help with it?

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Do what I want or I'll hurt you." I wonder how many little girls he said that to before he raped them. Ya know, cuz he's a fucking pedophile and Americans put him in the White House and are keeping him there with the backing of the entire GOP.

[-] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Best way for the world to fix it is to give him an all-expenses trip to Hague.

[-] amorangi@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 days ago

Drop him off in the Atlantic.

[-] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Hey now let's not throw more trash in the ocean

[-] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I could get behind that, but maybe the Antarctic just to make sure?

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

Nah, the Antarctic penguins were already punished by tariffs, they don't deserve another penalty.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Apparently the EU isn't as willing to jump to the aid of a pedophile as America's own technocrats are.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 days ago

Actually it is worse then that. He completly ends the Carter Doctrine of keeping Middle Easts oil flowing if necessary by force. This is a massive hit to the petrodollar as well.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 days ago

Oil was flowing through the Strait fine without US help. Now look at what they did.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago

good thing withdrawing from NATO requires an act of congress, not a temper tantrum.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Congress.

Lol.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Pedo Don has poopie in his diaper. He’s going to throw a fit if someone doesn’t clean his bum bum.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Shart Of The Deal.

[-] hypna@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I'm used to AP titles being pretty dry, but they have started putting some bite in them.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I’d hope NATO actually makes a clear distinction between aggressors and defenders in a war. Trump has already twisted ‘national threat’ to justify whatever he wants, and while his own country seems fine with it, I can’t imagine international allies just going along with that kind of logic

[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

NATO is a defensive alliance. It was used only once (right after 9/11).

In the past individual nations can choose to help, but that's outside of NATO's purpose.

No nation wants to help because 1) few months ago he threatened to attack NATO 2) the mess he created is massive and also no one trusts US government to be competent right now, so getting involved will only end up with even bigger losses

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So basically, it has nothing to do with NATO really.. How come he things it has?

[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

He is doing what putin asks. Putin loves creating dilemmas.

The ideal (for putin) scenario would be to have Europe to decide between getting oil from Russia (this is why trump lifted sanctions) or get involved in Middle East.

Both of those would lead to decreased support for Ukraine, first one he could threaten to cut oil off they didn't, the second would be very unpopular with public and Russia would exploit isolationist tendencies.

I'm actually glad that it looks like Ukraine is bombing Baltic terminals and Europe realized that greeting involved in the mess trump started will make things even worse.

And yeah there are people saying "how can trump new helping Russia when he attacked Venezuela and Iran who are Russian allies" the answer to it is to look if those actions helped putin or hurt putin.

In Venezuela he removed Maduro but kept the old Russian friendly government.

Iran it massively helped. The oil prices spiked when previously Russia was selling at a loss, by helping Iran Russia still is seen as ally and now US is dragged to the same war Russia sights with Ukraine (ideally he would want rest of NATO be dragged there too).

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

He didn't understand that he couldn't make deals with individual countries in the EU in his first term and badgered Merkel about it repeatedly despite being told. So he doesn't understand it, wilfully or otherwise ... but he's also surrounded himself with people that don't understand it either.

People like Trump don't use this type of talk to gain a better understanding or to communicate truth or ideas. They use it to get what they want, which is why his statements are jarring to people that pay any decent attention.

"The strait is fine" is to try to calm the stock market -- but -- "NATO needs to help the strait" is to get other people to fix his fuck up

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nobody in Europe cares

[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Dumbass says dumbass thing, what's the news here?

[-] oh_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I recall Donald saying we would be done in 2 to 3 weeks.

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
418 points (99.1% liked)

News

36965 readers
2030 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS