top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 62 points 2 years ago (22 children)

I'm sceptical. With all the added complexity of a foldable, the specs are probably gonna be below average to absymal. I'd love to be proven wrong tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago* (33 children)

    Every person I've known who has owned a foldable has had it eventually break because of the fold. We try to keep moving mechanical parts out of tech for a reason. I've never had a smartphone 'suddenly break' like a printer or car.

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    My Fold4 still looks new, and it's been a year now since I bought it. I use mine both as phone and a laptop replacement.. Sure inner screen is more fragile but also more protected when closed. You do have to set your expectations right. Definitely not a phone for people who don't take care of their own devices. But at the same time, device doesn't break by opening and closing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Whilst i might be biased, my samsung fold 3 has been fine for 2 years. My mum and step dad have had the flip 2 and 4, a colleague at work has a gold 4 and two colleagues at qork have a fold 5 each.

    No issues at all.

    I would argue that you have also formed a bias based on people you know who perhaps dont take care of their insanely expensive phones.

    Although saying that, I've dropped mine multiple times, onto wood flooring, ceramic tiles, and tarmac (i practically threw it onto the tarmac when something scared me). Amd all it auffered was a few scratches and dents on the edges. Both screens are absolutely fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Other than the novelty of it, I don't see the attraction of folding devices. Other than folding it doesn't do anything that my non-folding smartphone doesn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Ever try to stuff a modern phone into a small purse?

    Form factor has been a complaint since the HTC EVO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 44 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    It's so prone to cracking along the fold, though. You should either get the extended warranty or treat the phone as disposable, because it will likely not last more than a couple of years.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Every single person who I’ve known or seen with a foldable Samsung has a prominent fold (enough to lift the top layer of the screen) or crack.

    The tech just isn’t there yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Have been using the flip 3 for a couple years.

    I love the small design. Is it a Gimmick? Yeah probably. Do I like that Gimmick? Absolutely. It would he difficult to go back to a big ass phone. Routinely carry it at work by the ring on the case. Removes my need for a watch since I can easily reply or answer when it's closed, control media, etc.

    Love to see more unique smart phone options. The phones were too samey for too long. This budget option could help that innovation even more.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    I was looking at the bigger foldables and came to the reality I don't need it. Ended up getting a RAZR+. I'll never be able to go back to a full size phone now because of the size. I've just gotten used to using the outer screen and hope this size keeps getting better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    Samsung Gameboy PS

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago

    I'll adopt it once it's reliable enough that it won't crack along the screen.

  • source
  • [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Would rather have a new Samsung phone that's tiny

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    At last. Price has been the biggest barrier for most people

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Thank goodness. I'm sick of having a huge phone.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    I think this would be awesome if they used the same aspect ratio paper does, 1 to 1.414, so you could open the phone and have a phone in the same aspect ratio but larger. You know, if we're going to keep having nonsense screen aspect ratios where you can't watch any videos without black bars or zoom, you might as well do something fun with it.

    Edit: it's also really stupid that we've seen phones go from being folding, to smartphones, to slowly getting larger and taller over the years, to the point where now people are jonesing for this simply so they can have a more compact phone again. I doubt for most usage you're going to use the inner screen at all, there's pretty limited potential there in what you're watching and doing. Watching a video is probably gonna hit you with omega black bars. Only way I see this making any sense is if you have a classic square to real phone clamshell design, GBA style rather than DS style, but that still doesn't make that much sense to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'd love the idea, but graphene os support is my requirement.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Love to see more foldable options!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›