1
submitted 2 months ago by Teknevra@lemmy.world to c/odysee@lemmy.world

Hear me out.

Odysee already leans heavily into:

Crypto-native infrastructure

Creator monetization and boosts

Decentralization ethos

Resistance to deplatforming

User ownership principles

Those values line up really closely with what Nostr is trying to do — decentralized identity (pubkeys), relay-based distribution, censorship resistance, Lightning-native payments (zaps), etc.


If Odysee integrated with or transitioned toward Nostr:

Creator identities could be portable across the broader Nostr ecosystem

Video posts could propagate across relays

Boosts/zaps could tie into Lightning more seamlessly

It could position itself as the YouTube “video layer” of Nostr


Right now, if someone wants a decentralized YouTube alternative, the usual answers are:

PeerTube (Fediverse-based)

Odysee (LBRY-based)

But Nostr doesn’t really have a dominant video platform yet. Odysee already has the infrastructure, userbase, and crypto alignment.


So I’m curious:

Would this even be technically feasible?

Would it undermine Odysee, or could it complement it?

Would you prefer Odysee stay on its current path, or evolve toward broader protocol interoperability?

Is protocol alignment (Nostr, Fediverse, etc.) even something Odysee should prioritize?


Genuinely curious what this community thinks.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

odysee

156 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy community for Odysee.

Also subscribe to the !lbry@lemmy.world community. LBRY is the protocol Odysee is built on!


  1. Discussions must be around the Odysee platform.
  2. Posting Odysee media is allowed as long it is related to Odysee.
  3. When posting links to something on Odysee, a LBRY protocol link must be included (lbry://channel/media) HTTPS odysee links are allowed also but a LBRY protocol link is required.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS