There is no truer adage to me than nothings is perfect. And when it comes to anything related to Discord it’s no different.

Discord itself to me has been an issue for years. Its use of data collection, the obsession of companies trying to buy it all were concerning. For me the latest age verification just further reinforces my beliefs. That being said the majority of users who ignored all this and kept going, really nothing would change. Most people I know use Discord lightly and aren’t in large chats that use hentai gifs. I still would tell anyone who would listen to get out of dodge. But if you never cared about data usage then you’re probably not going to start now.

For all the alternatives out there truth is, none are really anywhere near perfect. Matrix and most of its clients while encrypted don’t offer true jump in /jump out game chat. More a kin to Skype really. Foss Discord implementations like Spacebar are to all over the place and for me are not really functional. Stoat while probably my favorite is still really small and not holding up to the stress of the user influx. And of course it’s missing “discord features” and the new kid Fluxer while appealing is still to new and it’s monetization model a little to concerning. 300 bucks as a backer for unproven project ? And of course with the exception of Matrix none of the other projects currently offer encryption.

Truth is no option really is ideal. Truth is all the options have some pretty serious flaws. And truth is getting your large swaths of friends to move might be close to impossible.

So if you are looking to move please do some digging. Ask people who use the apps their opinions. Try to as a group of friends chose to make a move.

And the final truth is it’s a really good thing we finally have some options. No matter the flaws having competition brings innovation.

I hope this posts helps clear up some things for people who might be confused or concerned.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 39 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Im about to try to self host stoat. I'm really feeling like spinning up 3 or 4 of the new services and trying each to see which one or mixture works best. If anyone else is doing this we should start a megathread

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 28 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I don’t believe Stoat is federated so your server would be in its own silo. But it’s great if you just want a space for you and your friends

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Oh, apologies if this was about federated options. I'm just excited for the death of discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    Movim would be a good one to try. It's actually more full featured than Stoat as well, as it offers Encryption, Federation (XMPP), group video/audio calls, and screensharing with application audio! (must use a chromium based browser to pass the audio for now). It is currently missing Discord-like channels with rooms, but the dev is actively working on that.

    Stoat currently cannot do video calls or screensharing, and has no plans to implement encryption or federation, AFAIK.

    Also @astropenguin5@lemmy.world, @Pika@sh.itjust.works and @betahack@lemmy.world

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

    From my quick testing I did the other day, the conclusion I came to was:

    • Fluxer looks like the easiest drop-in replacement for my group. I agree I am also a little hesitant about its longevity & funding.
    • Matrix UX leaves some to be desired, but it's functional and I like the E2EE.
    • We don't have anyone good enough at selfhosting in my group to even attempt Spacebar.
    • Stoat just doesn't seem viable. Lack of screenshare is a big issue for my group.

    Surprisingly, the new TeamSpeak 6 looks pretty okay to me, but the UX is pretty different so might have a little bit of a learning curve for some people in my group. It costs money for a server but honestly my group is fine with that. We used to pay for a Mumble server back in the day but it doesn't have robust text channels so we don't want to move back to that.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    EDIT: The Fluxer dev has agreed to remove the CLA!

    I was just informed today of a huge red flag for Fluxer; it has a contributor CLA that could allow it to change to a non-FLOSS license in the future. I was hopeful for it previously, but that kills it for me.

    Also @64bithero@lemmy.world

    I'll be sticking with Movim, which is already federated, encrypted, can do group video calls, can even screenshare, and most critically does not have a CLA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] [S] 8 points 6 months ago

    For me Fluxer is technically more feature complete with steaming options. But banners and custom emojis are behind paywalls. (Non local hosted)

    Stoat offers free banners, emojis a nice UI even a community browser! Its voice chat works well enough but no streaming features. Stoat is purely donation based at the moment.

    Sounds like Fluxer is gaining momentum mainstream wise. I’m happy with either option …

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

    Fluxer wants to have a 'monetization' to give payouts to 'creators.' Hard pass.

    My wife and I have been using Stoat and it's been mostly fine, but they're already implementing age verification.

    Stoat being based in UK makes me nervous as their laws are ridiculous. Devs claim that they are going to try to only apply draconian things when necessary but I have my doubts.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 22 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Read the privacy policies too. I can't remember which one I was reading yesterday but it read like they were going to monitor every word I said... All the while saying they are privacy advocates and based in Europe

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    If you can remember please report in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It might have been fluxer but I'm not positive. I've been looking at all of the options because I need an alternative so there's lots of mixed info in my brain. I should have started a spreadsheet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Even stoat writes on their privacy policy they store everything you write on their servers. That if needed they will hand over what’s required of them as of GPDR compliancy.

    Now if that analyze said data and sell it, that’s another thing entirely.

    With both Stoat and Fluxer community audits should be done, if Fluxer has had AI generated code that opens up unforeseen risk.

    Thanks for the heads up!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    This was probably one of the first times I can remember when our chat programs were under one primary program. Before Discord there was market segmentation abound and I think it made the system better for there were alternate means of contact. Discord becoming monolithic like it it did was a real issue and let's be honest, we need to have alternatives. I foresee Discord still being used for a bit by most of my groups, but they are certainly considering alternatives.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Genuinely curious: Stoat's Community Guidelines list the legal jurisdiction for their Service Operator as the United Kingdom (sorry for the awkward sentence structure) I know that any online platform that provides "risky" content to the UK has to perform age checks, but I'm curious if the privacy impact increases when the service is hosted in the UK? Eg, would they be required to conduct age checks for all users, rather than just UK users?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    I wasn't really sure if the US chatroom app infamous for harboring pedophiles and saving hyperlinks of users' deleted photos in rooms' modlog was evil but now that the logo is red and has scary eyes I'm seriously considering it

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I’ve gone through like 5 different services trying to set one up. Am I dumb or does no one know how to make a straightforward docker compose? I thought the whole point of Compose was to copy-paste a config, change a few variables and hit go. Several of these assume you know so much about how to setup these services and then just leave you to your devices.

    I want like 5 or 6 variables in an .env file. No reason I should have to spin up my own database and link it when you should be containerizing the entire thing in the first place. The only services so far that I’ve had any success setting up are Mattermost (which doesn’t offer group calls) and VoceChat (which I can’t get the voice to work in).

    All the others either don’t offer voice at all or I can’t get past the setup.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

    I have offered to do a lot of education and technical effort surrounding this, e.g. helping groups migrate in some of the circles I'm involved with and all it's really gotten me is abuse and condescension, bafflingly. No one cares and if they do it's mostly superficial and they want the easiest way out—someone/something do everything for me, and I mean everything. I don't want to click more than two buttons and even that is pushing it, buster. Sometimes there aren't easy solutions, though, and I think this is one of those times. Big Tech is massive and in the world we live in now we cannot have all of the things it promises without immense tradeoff, and for the most part it just isn't worth it. The modern web being almost completely centralized around Discord is really harmful, like what happened with Facebook years ago. What used to be simple, publicly accessible websites for all these groups, locations and interests with email, forums and chat rooms for asynchronous as well as real-time communication is now entirely on Discord or Facebook. It's disastrous. Neither of those things are easily accessible or friendly to archival...why do I need to be in a Discord chat room or Facebook group for community events around my public library? It's absurd. I hate all of this so much, and basically no one around me agrees with me so we'll just circle the drain forever while the "pet cameras" start calling DHS on our neighbors.

    I'm just going back to xmpp, maybe mumble for voice calls. They're both friendly and simple and xmpp supports modern features just fine. I can host it for myself and my friends who care; I don't have much hope for the masses anymore. I don't really like how bloated Matrix/Synapse is, and everything else is riding coattails we don't need to ride. I don't care about video games or streaming to people in a chat room or anything like that, and if I did I'm sure something like Jitsi handles that well enough. Oh no, a second program!! We are all so dependent on tech in our lives but it seems like so many want nothing to do with being informed about it on any level...I just don't get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I have offered to do a lot of education and technical effort surrounding this, e.g. helping groups migrate in some of the circles I’m involved with and all it’s really gotten me is abuse and condescension, bafflingly. No one cares and if they do it’s mostly superficial and they want the easiest way out—someone/something do everything for me, and I mean everything. I don’t want to click more than two buttons and even that is pushing it, buster.

    Oh no, a second program!! We are all so dependent on tech in our lives but it seems like so many want nothing to do with being informed about it on any level…I just don’t get it.

    I feel this in my soul, and it's something I've noticed a lot on reddit when trying to tell people that lemmy/piefed exist. Some of them will just find any reason whatsoever to not do something, pointing out the most minor of differences or slightest inconveniences as insurmountable obstacles that no human could be expected to overcome, and usually end it with "if It's not already perfect/better than what I'm currently using (despite the alternative not being actively user-hostile like the thing they're using and complain about is) I'm not going to bother".

    I’m just going back to xmpp, maybe mumble for voice calls.

    With the Movim client (or Dino client), XMPP can do group voice/video calls :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    discord was a one-stop shop for multiple very different things.

    Retvrn to gamer clans coordinating in forums, talking in mumble, chatting in IRC &c.

    one program for one purpose and a community webpage tying it all together

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Any opinions on team speak 3?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The big problem is, every good privacy-respecting solution costs money and comes with the inconvenience of setting up a new account. Having lived 90s Internet I don't mind that at all, I actually kind of prefer it, but I can understand how younger folks can be discouraged.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    My young friend was like , why would you have to pay for a server?? And I'm Like bud, if you aren't paying, you are the product. They don't get concepts like servers and that they are offsite hardware...hard for them to conceptualize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    my solution is Zulip/XMPP/IRC/Jitsi, none of them can replace every functions of discord but they partially can and it seems like they'll work for my use case.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Managed to get a matrix server up + a web client frontend hosted on same site for friend group .

    3 container docker compose: continuwuity, tunnel, premade Cinny image with nginx serving frontend.

    Great if you don't care about voice, but if you do then you'll need to host a TURN server on a VPS and connect home server to that.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago*

    I'm not looking for perfect. I just want a similar layout with custom emoji and decent permission control.

    The closest I've seen is space bar, stout or matrix. But matrix is a beast to get people on, and stout + space bar are both really premature atm client wise.

    some of my group moved to steam groups but it's so clunky and missing many features

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    For all the alternatives out there truth is, none are really anywhere near perfect. Matrix and most of its clients while encrypted don’t offer true jump in /jump out game chat.

    After complaining about it heavily for a few days, I did find one client that has that same feel, commet.chat. I haven't done a whole lot of testing yet, but from what I've seen/experienced, it's close, if not there

    Personally I still prefer XMPP+Cheogram. It's more Signal than Discord, but it's a lightweight chat server with voice call abilities, and that's what I needed it for

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    i got a team speak 6 server running for my friend group. there are things i wish were better, but ultimately it’s really not that big of a deal. mainly it’s the separating the text chat from the voip servers, and the text chat not being hosted on my machine. but then again others would rather it was on a companies servers any way

    but now it’s just the work of pushing my friends to not stick around due to momentum and the whole “but discord retracted their decision! i don’t want to!”

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›