Let's speculate and post hot takes before this stat changes.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Going nearly a month without playing is actually a huge negative and these playoffs hurt the good teams with a bye. We should be watching the final or semi finals today, not a month from now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So you're telling me there's hope that Oregon will win

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 7 months ago

    0-6. Sucks to win a bye I guess.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Aged like milk go Hoosiers

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Ok, so someone go put a real big bet on bama real quick, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    If every bye team loses again, they will update the format, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I think the update is happening either way, though probably not to a better system for the fans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    All they really need to do is expand to 16 teams so no team has a bye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    That just adds more bad teams, maybe it solves the not playing in a month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    It does, but it's mostly to keep the top seeds from getting rusty. They could also make it so every conference champion gets in, then the 6 best teams outside of that get in as well. Their would still be some drama from the 6 who got in, but it should overall work out.

  • source
  • parent